Corridor K: A Revived Relic of the 1960s
Billion-Dollar Proposed New NC, TN Highway Sections Threaten Mountains and Forests
Goforth Creek Canyon named on Top 10 list of Endangered Places for 2013
SELC’s 5th annual Top 10 Endangered Places list targets areas of exceptional scenic, ecological, or cultural value that face urgent, potentially irreversible threats in the coming year. Goforth Creek Canyon, Tennessee, has been named on the 2013 list due to the threat of Corridor K.
TDOT has proposed several routes that would push new asphalt through the Cherokee National Forest and across the canyon -- a beautiful and popular spot for hiking, camping, and trout fishing on the Ocoee Scenic Byway. Building a highway here would destroy the natural character of this mountain setting, eliminate access to a scenic overlook, and pollute the creek’s trout waters with oil, muddy runoff, and even sulfuric acid from the unstable rock formations exposed by the project.
SELC is urging TDOT to shift its focus away from spending up to a billion dollars to a build an unnecessary new highway in this rugged terrain, and instead make targeted, cost-effective improvements to the existing two-lane highway. Learn more.
Some of the most stunning mountain forests in the Southeast are in the path of Corridor K, a once-dormant but now rebooted billion-dollar plan to replace portions of the U.S. highways connecting Chattanooga, Tennessee and Asheville, North Carolina.
First proposed in the 1960s, before these two cities were connected by interstates, Corridor K was conceived as a way to spur industrial development in the Appalachians. Today, however, building new highways through unbroken forests would jeopardize the region’s true economic engine: the unspoiled vistas, clear-running trout waters, and backcountry recreation sites that drive outdoor tourism.
Pushing Asphalt Through Sensitive Terrain
The existing highway between Chattanooga and Asheville, much of which consists of overbuilt and underused four-lanes stretches, is perfectly adequate for the area’s projected transportation needs. The proposed new highways would slash through steep, mountainous countryside and exact a huge toll on the region’s natural heritage and taxpayers’ pocketbooks.
In addition to highlighting the impacts on mountain and forest ecosystems and outdoor recreation, SELC is training a spotlight on the fact that projected traffic levels fail to justify the enormous cost of building new highways through these rugged landscapes. What’s more, all of this new asphalt would do little to improve current travel times.
A More Cost-Effective Option
The sensible alternative is to make improvements to the safety and efficiency of existing roads, which would avoid robbing hundreds of millions of dollars from real transportation needs in both Tennessee and North Carolina. In fact, the stream of federal funds once earmarked for Corridor K has been cut off by Congress. Completing this project would take dollars away from other priorities, such as repairing structurally deficient bridges.
A Threat to the Cherokee National Forest
As part of the Corridor K project, the Tennessee Department of Transportation is proposing to build a new highway through the Cherokee National Forest north of the existing highway, which follows the Ocoee River. It would destroy much-loved recreation areas, cause constant truck noise in protected wilderness areas, and fragment habitat for black bear and other wildlife.
In addition to chewing through largely pristine national forest lands, the new highway would require blasting through areas containing “hot rock,” resulting in potentially disastrous acidic runoff in trout streams and the Ocoee.
A Threat to the Snowbird Mountains
In North Carolina, the current plan for Corridor K is to build a new four-lane highway on unstable mountain terrain in the viewshed of the Appalachian Trail and upstream of prime trout waters. One segment would entail cutting a 2,870-foot tunnel under the Snowbird Mountains—a tunnel that would require a 24-hour on site emergency staff. As in Tennessee, the pyritic rock exposed by the project would result in acid-laden runoff in mountain streams.
In both states, an alternative plan that takes advantage of existing roadways could be built now with available funds, but the state departments of transportation have resisted even considering these common sense solutions.