<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>SELC Press Releases</title>
    <link>http://www.southernenvironment.org/</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>ksullivan@selcnc.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2012</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2012-02-03T19:29:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://expressionengine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>Corps Not Exempt from Pollution Controls on Savannah Deepening Project</title>
      <link>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/savannah_corps_pollution_control_act_2-3-12/</link>
      <guid>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/savannah_corps_pollution_control_act_2-3-12/#When:19:29:31Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers failed to obtain a South Carolina pollution control permit for its controversial project to deepen the Savannah River, according to a <a href="/uploads/fck/SELC PCA Complaint - 2-3-12.pdf">lawsuit </a>filed today in state court by the Southern Environmental Law Center on behalf of Georgia and South Carolina conservation groups.</p>
<p>&ldquo;This project cannot proceed until and unless the Corps obtains a South Carolina Pollution Control Act permit that guarantees the right of citizens to review the proposal and reduce its serious impacts on the Savannah River,&rdquo; said Chris DeScherer, senior attorney, Southern Environmental Law Center. &ldquo;The federal government cannot ignore South Carolina&rsquo;s process to protect the health of the state&rsquo;s natural resources and its residents against the risks and harm of deepening. As it stands now, the Corps proposes to dredge up potentially toxic pollutants, dump spoils in South Carolina, and damage the river so badly it needs mechanical life support that the government&rsquo;s own experts say could be lethal.&rdquo;</p>
<p>According to the claim filed in state circuit court in Jasper County, the Corps failed to obtain a permit that would ensure the implementation of pollution controls during its 38-mile deepening project as required by South Carolina law. Dredging to deepen the river to the planned 48 feet will stir up toxic cadmium and other pollutants and discharge the pollution into the water. Exposure to certain forms and concentrations of cadmium is known to produce toxic effects on humans. The Corps plans to dump much of its dredging spoil in Jasper County, South Carolina.</p>
<p>The $650 million deepening project will deplete the Savannah River&rsquo;s dissolved oxygen levels so much that the Corps proposes to put the river on untested mechanical life support&mdash;called Speece cones&mdash;for perpetuity. Even if Speece cones work and funds are found for their ongoing maintenance, the Corps&rsquo; own experts report that &ldquo;the oxygen injection system proposed (Speece cones) could have lethal impacts to fish species.&rdquo; Endangered and threatened short-nosed sturgeon, American shad and striped bass in the Savannah River would be among the fish harmed by either the deepening or the Corps&rsquo; proposed Speece cones.</p>
<p>Lower oxygen levels in the Savannah River from deepening will also create complications for industrial dischargers and lake communities upstream, and seasonal dead zones compounded by salt water intrusion further into the river and the ground water supplies for local communities on both sides of the river.</p>
<p>Attorneys from the Southern Environmental Law Center filed today&rsquo;s claim in state court on behalf of the Savannah Riverkeeper, based in Augusta, as well as the Coastal Conservation League and the South Carolina Wildlife Federation.</p>
<p>The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Georgia Ports Authority propose to spend $650 million in taxpayer money and irreparably harm the river despite the Corps&rsquo; finding that deepening the river for large &ldquo;post-panamax&rdquo; ships would not increase Savannah&rsquo;s port business and that cargo volume would remain the same even without the costly deepening project.</p>
<p>###</p>
<p><span style="font-size: smaller">The Southern Environmental Law Center is a regional nonprofit using the power of the law to protect the health and environment of the Southeast (Virginia, Tennessee, North and South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama). Founded in 1986, SELC&#8217;s team of more than 40 legal and policy experts represent more than 100 partner groups on issues of climate change and energy, air and water quality, forests, the coast and wetlands, transportation, and land use. <br />
WEB: www.SouthernEnvironment.org <br />
TWITTER: http://www.twitter.com/selc_org </span></p>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2012-02-03T19:29:31+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Virginia Should Focus on Offshore Wind, Not Oil</title>
      <link>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/2012-02-02_offshore_wind/</link>
      <guid>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/2012-02-02_offshore_wind/#When:21:02:37Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Obama Administration today released the final environmental assessment clearing the way for leasing of federal offshore tracts for site assessment and location of commercial wind farms off the coast of Virginia and other mid-Atlantic states. This expedites the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) process for&nbsp; allowing developers to investigate and propose specific projects, which would then go through a more thorough environmental review process to ensure protection for marine life.</p>
<p>The agency reduced the potential leasing area in Virginia by 19% to accommodate shipping interests and concerns from the Coast Guard, leaving open some 113,000 acres.&nbsp; BOEM said it expects to issue numerous leases in the mid-Atlantic this year resulting from a competitive bidding process.&nbsp;</p>
<p>A statement from David Carr, SELC senior attorney and general counsel:</p>
<p>&quot;We&nbsp; commend the Obama Administration for taking this vital step towards bringing offshore wind energy to Virginia and other mid-Atlantic states.</p>
<p>&quot;The offshore wind industry has the potential to create huge amounts of power and thousands of jobs , while reducing our dependence on dirty fossil fuels. It's time now for Virginia to double-down on its&nbsp; support for developing a truly sustainable energy future, beginning with shifting Governor McDonnell's misplaced emphasis on opening our coast to oil and gas drilling to instead developing this clean energy source.&quot;<br />
&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2012-02-02T21:02:37+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Federal transportation bill would drive fiscal accountability and environmental protections into a ditch</title>
      <link>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/2012-02-01_federal-transportation-reauth/</link>
      <guid>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/2012-02-01_federal-transportation-reauth/#When:18:21:21Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The House of Representatives majority leadership released a sweeping transportation bill yesterday that would upend long-accepted practices for how the nation's highways, bridges are planned and built, gutting basic environmental safeguards for air and water quality and green space, and deepening our dependence on oil.&nbsp; It also threatens coastal communities and ecology by opening up the Atlantic for the first time to oil and gas drilling.</p>
<p>The American Energy and Infrastructure Jobs Act is expected to be in mark-up in the House Natural Resources Committee today, and in mark-up in the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee tomorrow.</p>
<p>&quot;This bill is less about creating jobs and more about giving the green light to the oil industry and road-builders,&quot; said Navis Bermudez, SELC deputy legislative director. &quot;The House leadership is clearly not interested in providing Americans a fiscally and environmentally sound transportation system for the 21st century. By contrast, the Senate sees this bill for the political grandstanding that it is, and has indicated it will not take the bill seriously.&quot;</p>
<p>The bill holds some especially dangerous proposals for the South, including:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Exempting highway projects that are declared to be for economic development from any review under the National Environmental Policy Act, a bedrock law that ensures opportunity for citizen input and a reasonable calculation as to the cost-benefit of such projects.&nbsp; If the law were in effect, hugely expensive and unnecessary highways in the South would likely be on a fast-track for approval:</li>
</ul>
<p style="margin-left: 80px">o Northern Beltline in Birmingham, AL-$4.7 billion<br />
o Garden Parkway and Monroe Bypass in Charlotte, NC-$960 million and $800 million<br />
o I-526 Extension in Charleston, SC-$489 million<br />
o I-73 in Myrtle Beach, SC-$2.4 billion<br />
o I-75/575 Expansion in Atlanta-$1 billion<br />
o U.S. 460 Expansion in Virginia-$1.6 billion<br />
o U.S. 29 Bypass in Charlottesville, VA-$250 million</p>
<ul>
    <li>Opening the Virginia coast to offshore oil drilling to pay for the transportation bill, despite the administration's decision in December to delay a controversial lease sale. In addition to threatening the environment and coastal economies, relying on uncertain revenue from drilling instead of the existing gas tax to fund the nation's transportation infrastructure is risky business; even fiscal conservatives object to this change.</li>
    <li>Severely cutting funding for Amtrak at a time when ridership on Virginia and North Carolina lines is rising faster than any others in the country;&nbsp;</li>
    <li>Failing to prioritize repair of crumbling bridges; there are over 22,000 structurally deficient or functionally obsolete bridges in SELC's six-state region.</li>
    <li>Spending almost eight times more on project loans while eliminating key criteria for reviewing loan applications that help ensure taxpayer funds are spent wisely</li>
</ul>
<p><br />
****************************</p>
<p>WEB: <a href="http://www.SouthernEnvironment.org">www.SouthernEnvironment.org</a><br />
FACEBOOK: <a href="http://www.fanofselc.org">http://www.fanofselc.org</a><br />
TWITTER: <a href="http://www.twitter.com/selc_org">http://www.twitter.com/selc_org</a><br />
&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2012-02-01T18:21:21+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Top 10 Endangered Places in the Southeast Identified by the Southern Environmental Law Center</title>
      <link>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/top_ten_01-26-12/</link>
      <guid>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/top_ten_01-26-12/#When:18:49:10Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Charlottesville, Va. &mdash; January 26, 2012 &mdash; The Southern Environmental Law Center (SELC), the largest environmental advocacy organization dedicated to protecting the Southeast, today announced its fourth annual list of the top 10 places in the South that face immediate, potentially irreparable threats in 2012. <br />
<br />
Many of the areas on SELC&rsquo;s Top 10 list are endangered by pressure to undercut environmental protections and to lower the hurdles for potentially destructive projects, whether it&rsquo;s fracking in the North Carolina Piedmont, uranium mining in Virginia, or deepwater drilling in the Gulf. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;The South&rsquo;s special places and natural riches are threatened by a wave of calculated attacks on the bedrock laws that protect our environment and health,&rdquo; said Marie Hawthorne, SELC&rsquo;s Director of Development. &ldquo;Under the guise of promoting economic growth, anti-environmental forces are working in Congress, in state legislatures, and in government agencies to gut our most essential safeguards. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;The truth is, environmental protection had nothing to do with the financial crisis or today&rsquo;s weak economy,&rdquo; Hawthorne added. &ldquo;Doing away with effective laws and enforcement will accomplish nothing except sacrifice the natural treasures like those on our Top 10 list and other resources that make the South such a great place live, work, and raise our families. We owe it to ourselves&mdash;and to future generations&mdash;to make sure this doesn&rsquo;t happen.&rdquo; <br />
<strong><br />
Top 10 Endangered Places in the Southeast for 2012  </strong></p>
<p><em>The following endangered areas were chosen from among hundreds of special places that the SELC is defending through its law and policy work in the six states of Virginia, Tennessee, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia and Alabama.</em><br />
<br />
<strong>Alabama&rsquo;s coast:</strong> Following the tragic BP spill, the government has returned to business as usual and is authorizing risky deepwater drilling projects under the same assumptions that failed in the <em>Deepwater Horizon</em> disaster. This approach is irresponsible, illegal, and poses an ongoing threat to Alabama&rsquo;s beaches, marshes, wildlife, and coastal communities.  &nbsp;</p>
<p><strong> Dawson Forest, Georgia:</strong> A costly, unnecessary proposed reservoir would siphon 100 million gallons per day from the Etowah River to fuel metro Atlanta&rsquo;s unchecked sprawl, threatening prime habitat for endangered aquatic life, water supplies of downstream communities, and a popular recreation area. &nbsp;</p>
<p> <strong>Catawba-Wateree River Basin, North Carolina &amp; South Carolina:</strong> The health of the Catawba-Wateree River, which provides drinking water for hundreds of thousands of residents of central North Carolina and South Carolina, faces an array of threats, including pollution from toxin-laden coal ash ponds, hydroelectric dams that will continue to disrupt stream flows and fish migration, water withdrawals that rob water from downstream farms and communities, and unnecessary reservoir projects that promote inefficient development and water use. </p>
<p><strong>  North Carolina Piedmont:</strong> The gas drilling industry and its allies in the North Carolina General Assembly are pushing hard to pass legislation that would expedite hydraulic fracturing (a.k.a. &lsquo;fracking&rsquo;) to extract natural gas, despite mounting evidence that the drilling technique, in the absence of appropriate regulatory controls, can lead to the contamination of groundwater and surface water. Potential fracking sites in North Carolina&rsquo;s Piedmont are underneath or upstream from water supplies for 2.4 million people.   </p>
<p><strong>Savannah River, South Carolina &amp; Georgia: </strong>The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers&rsquo; plan to deepen 38 miles of the Savannah River shipping channel would increase saltwater intrusion in the river and jeopardize freshwater marshlands in the Savannah National Wildlife Refuge, drinking water supplies for Savannah and other communities, and habitat for endangered aquatic species.  </p><p>&nbsp; Chilhowee Mountain, Tennessee: The outdated plan for completing Corridor K between Chattanooga and Asheville includes a proposal to cut a new four-lane highway through the Cherokee National Forest near the Ocoee Gorge, even though improvements to the existing two-lane highway on its current footprint would be less damaging, less costly, and no less effective.</p>
<p><strong>Chesapeake Bay, Virginia: </strong>For decades the Bay has suffered from pollution from all sides&mdash;air, land, and water. Unfortunately, industry interests and their political allies are doing all they can to impede a comprehensive rescue plan.<br />
<strong><br />
Mountains of Tennessee &amp; Virginia:</strong> Mountaintop removal and other destructive coal mining practices have already destroyed at least 500 mountains and damaged 1,700 miles of streams in Virginia, Tennessee and other central Southern Appalachian states, and pressure continues to mount.</p>
<p><strong>Charlottesville, Virginia &amp; Surrounding Countryside:</strong> Local and state decision-makers are attempting to revive a wasteful, destructive and ineffective proposed bypass that would leave a permanent scar on one of the South&rsquo;s most special communities.<br />
<br />
<strong>Southside Virginia: </strong>An intense push to mine uranium in southern Virginia risks polluting drinking water supplies with radioactive and toxin-laden wastewater. Lifting the state&rsquo;s ban on uranium mining could open up Virginia&rsquo;s Piedmont countryside to more large-scale mining projects.<br />
<br />
<strong>About the Southern Environmental Law Center (SELC)  </strong></p>
<p>SELC is the largest environmental organization focused exclusively on the South. For 25 years, the Southern Environmental Law Center has worked successfully in all three branches of government to create, implement, and enforce environmental law and policy. Their major programs cover clean energy, transportation and land use, southern forests, the coast and wetlands, and preservation of rural countryside and community character. SELC has 46 attorneys (out of a total staff of 90) and offices in Charlottesville (SELC&rsquo;s headquarters) and Richmond, Virginia; Chapel Hill and Asheville, North Carolina; Charleston, South Carolina; Atlanta, Georgia; Birmingham, Alabama; and Washington, D.C. www.SouthernEnvironment.org.  </p>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2012-01-26T18:49:10+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>General Assembly Support Needed to Continue Virginia&#39;s Successful Regional Trains</title>
      <link>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/2012-01-24_rail_service_report/</link>
      <guid>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/2012-01-24_rail_service_report/#When:17:31:25Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Virginians for High Speed Rail</strong>, the <strong>Southern Environmental Law Center</strong>, the <strong>Hampton Roads Chamber of Commerce</strong>, the<strong> Greater Richmond Chamber of Commerce</strong>, and the <strong>Lynchburg Chamber of Commerce </strong>jointly released a report outlining the importance of Virginia's six roundtrip intercity regional trains and requesting the General Assembly's support to continue and improve these services. These six trains connect over 66 percent of all Virginians and serve the communities of Alexandria, Burke Centre, Quantico, Woodbridge, Manassas, Culpeper, Fredericksburg, Ashland, Charlottesville, Henrico, Downtown Richmond, Lynchburg, Williamsburg, Newport News, Petersburg (fall 2012), Norfolk (fall 2012), Roanoke (bus connection), and Virginia Beach (bus connection), and link them to&nbsp; Washington, DC and&nbsp; the Northeast corridor.</p>
<p>To read the report, click <a href="http://www.southernenvironment.org/uploads/publications/VA_Regional_Trains.pdf">here</a>.</p>
<p>Amtrak service in the Commonwealth has grown by over 50 percent during the last five years, and two of the top three best performing regional train routes in Amtrak's system are in the Commonwealth. Virginians are proving that they want the transportation choices that intercity passenger trains provide, and they want more train options.</p>
<p>The report also highlights the fact that the Commonwealth needs an estimated $115.4 million over the next five years to sustain these regional trains. If Virginia does not fund the continued operation of these trains, it will not only lose critical transportation options but it could cost taxpayers over $1 billion to reinstate train service that is discontinued.</p>
<p>Two pieces of legislation introduced in the 2012 General Assembly session partially fund the Virginia Intercity Passenger Rail Operating and Capital Fund (IPROC) and the Commonwealth's regional trains. First, Governor McDonnell included short-term funding of $26.1 million in his 2012-2014 biennial budget sponsored by Senator Chuck Colgan (Senate Bill 30) and Delegate Lacy Putney (House Bill 30) which will fund the continued operation of the regional trains for the next two years. Second, Senator John Watkins introduced a budget item in the 2010-2012 biennial budget that would direct $67.2 million from the Commonwealth's budget surplus to IPROC which can be used for infrastructure or operations. These proposals are important short-term measures, and they should be adopted. <u>However, we also need to identify a long-term, dedicated, and sustainable funding source to allow our trains to operate beyond 2014</u>.</p>
<p>&quot;The record performance of rail in Virginia last year shows that people want more transportation choices,&quot; said Trip Pollard, Director of the Southern Environmental Law Center's Land and Community Program. &quot;Intercity rail is a cleaner, more efficient option that can reduce congestion, pollution, and dependence on foreign oil while promoting community revitalization and economic growth.&quot;</p>
<p>Jack Hornbeck, CCE, President &amp; CEO of the Hampton Roads Chamber of Commerce, said, &quot;The Hampton Roads Chamber of Commerce has long supported improved transportation infrastructure. This region has a unique national asset, containing the largest concentration of federal activities anywhere in the country outside of D.C. Dependable, efficient, and cost effective rail service to and from the D.C. area would provide a vital transportation link.&quot;</p>
<p>&quot;Virginia's regional trains are important to our economy creating jobs, removing cars from the roads, and connecting the Commonwealth's population centers to each other and to the Northeast Corridor&quot; stated Danny Plaugher, Executive Director of Virginians for High Speed Rail, &quot;That is why we need the General Assembly to act and make sure that we do not lose Virginia's regional train service.&quot;</p>
<p><strong>Virginians for High Speed Rail </strong>(VHSR) is a non-profit 501(C)(3) coalition, founded in 1994, that educates and advocates for the improvement and expansion of fast, frequent, and reliable intercity and high speed passenger rail service connecting Virginia to the northeast and southeast corridors. For more information visit <a href="http://www.vhsr.com">www.vhsr.com</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2012-01-24T17:31:25+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>National Park Service Finally Issues Rules for Responsible Beach Driving in Cape Hatteras</title>
      <link>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/national_park_service_finally_issues_rules_for_responsible_beach_driving_in/</link>
      <guid>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/national_park_service_finally_issues_rules_for_responsible_beach_driving_in/#When:18:15:07Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The National Park Service today announced new rules to manage off-road vehicle traffic on beaches so nesting and baby sea turtles and birds as well as pedestrians are protected in Cape Hatteras National Seashore, according to conservation groups. In 2007, the groups&mdash;Audubon North Carolina, Defenders of Wildlife and Southern Environmental Law Center&mdash; turned to the courts for help in getting the NPS to implement long overdue safeguards for pedestrians and beach-nesting wildlife on park beaches overrun by off-road vehicles. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;The park service&rsquo;s rules are a compromise that provides protections for both pedestrians and wildlife while still allowing responsible beach driving,&rdquo; said Julie Youngman, senior attorney, Southern Environmental Law Center. <br />
<br />
The long-awaited rules are the final step in a process agreed to by all parties concerned about beach driving in the national seashore. During an interim management period prior to today&rsquo;s rulemaking, rare bird and sea turtle populations showed signs of recovery, park visitation held steady or increased annually, and tourism remained strong in Dare County, NC, where much of the seashore is located, despite a recession. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;With both the number of hatchlings and visitors to the beach climbing, the success of responsible beach management is clear,&rdquo; said Jason Rylander, senior attorney for Defenders of Wildlife. &ldquo;The new rules will ensure that Cape Hatteras continues to provide enjoyment to beach users while protecting the unique wildlife that call the seashore home.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
Tourism flourished in Dare County during the period when interim protections were in place. Rental occupancy receipts in Dare County increased by millions over the previous decade as recorded by the Outer Banks Visitors Bureau. Park visitation and gross occupancy in Dare County during peak breeding and nesting season under interim management held steady or increased compared to the three preceding years. According to a state report on tourism for 2009-2010, Dare County experienced an 8.8 percent growth in tourism&mdash;making it among the top growth counties in the state during a recession. The county&rsquo;s strong tourism industry employed 11,260 people with $172 million in payroll and generated $44.55 million in tax receipts for the state and $39.78 million in local tax receipts. <br />
<br />
As a unit of the National Park System, Cape Hatteras National Seashore has been required under federal law since 1972 to establish guidelines that minimize harm from the use of off-road vehicles to the natural resources of the seashore in accordance with the best available science for present and future generations. The new rules bring the NPS into compliance with that requirement. <br />
<br />
The park service&rsquo;s rules allow ORV use on the majority of the seashore. Twenty-eight of the seashore&rsquo;s 67 miles are set aside as year-round ORV routes, with only 26 miles designated as year-round vehicle-free areas for pedestrians, families, and wildlife. The remaining 13 miles of seashore are seasonally open to ORVs. The plan also proposes new parking facilities, ORV ramps, and water shuttles to increase visitor access to beaches. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;Under the reasonable, science-based management of the past few years, beach-nesting birds and sea turtles are rebounding at Cape Hatteras National Seashore and visitors continue to flock to this national treasure,&rdquo; said Heather Starck, executive director of Audubon North Carolina. &ldquo;The new rules appear to give the National Park Service the guidance to protect and manage the natural resources while allowing for responsible ORV use.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
With temporary beach driving rules implemented in April 2008, beach-nesting birds and sea turtles within the national seashore showed signs of recovery after reaching alarming lows under unmanaged beach driving. Only 44 sea turtle nests were recorded in 2004, but a record-breaking 153 sea turtle nests were recorded in 2010 and 147 sea turtle nests were recorded in 2011. No piping plover chicks survived to fledge (learn to fly) in 2002 and 2004, but 15 chicks fledged in 2010 and ten fledged in 2011. <br />
<br />
### <br />
<br />
<strong>Note to editors: <br />
</strong>&bull; Charts showing data for wildlife numbers at Cape Hatteras National Seashore as reported by NPS are available at: <a href="http://www.southernenvironment.org/cases/beach_driving_on_cape_hatteras_national_seashore/cape_hatteras_national_seashore_species_under_consent_decree/">http://www.southernenvironment.org/cases/beach_driving_on_cape_hatteras_national_seashore/cape_hatteras_national_seashore_species_under_consent_decree/</a> &nbsp;<br />
&bull; Dare County Gross Occupancy graphs as reported by the Outer Banks Visitors Bureau are available at <br />
<a href="http://www.southernenvironment.org/uploads/fck/Dare%20County%20Gross%20Occupancy%201994-2011.pdf">http://www.southernenvironment.org/uploads/fck/Dare%20County%20Gross%20Occupancy%201994-2011.pdf</a>&nbsp;and <br />
<a href="http://www.southernenvironment.org/uploads/fck/Dare%20County%20Gross%20Occupancy%202005-2011.pdf">http://www.southernenvironment.org/uploads/fck/Dare%20County%20Gross%20Occupancy%202005-2011.pdf</a> &nbsp;<br />
&bull; A chart of Cape Hatteras National Seashore Visitation as reported by NPS is available at <br />
<a href="http://www.southernenvironment.org/uploads/fck/CHNS%20Visitation%202005-2011.pdf">http://www.southernenvironment.org/uploads/fck/CHNS%20Visitation%202005-2011.pdf</a> &nbsp;<br />
&bull; Photos of birds and sea turtles Cape Hatteras habitats are available by contacting <a href="mailto:iphillips@audubon.org">iphillips@audubon.org</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: smaller"><strong>About Defenders of Wildlife</strong> <br />
Defenders of Wildlife is dedicated to the protection of all native animals and plants in their natural communities. With more than 1 million members, supporters and subscribers, Defenders of Wildlife is a leading advocate for innovative solutions to safeguard our wildlife heritage for generations to come. </span><a href="http://www.defenders.org"><span style="font-size: smaller">www.defenders.org</span></a><span style="font-size: smaller"> &nbsp;<br />
<br />
<strong>About National Audubon Society</strong> <br />
The National Audubon Society has more than one million members and supporters, offices in 23 states, and a presence in all 50 states through more than 450 certified chapters, nature centers, sanctuaries, and education and science programs. Locally, Audubon maintains a North Carolina state office which works on behalf of Audubon&rsquo;s more than 14,000 members and supporters in ten chapters across state. Audubon&rsquo;s mission is to conserve and restore natural ecosystems, focusing on birds, other wildlife, and their habitats for the benefit of humanity and the earth&rsquo;s biological diversity. It carries out that mission nationally through a variety of activities including education, habitat conservation and public policy advocacy. <br />
</span><a href="http://www.ncaudubon.org"><span style="font-size: smaller">www.ncaudubon.org</span></a><span style="font-size: smaller">&nbsp; <br />
<br />
<strong>About the Southern Environmental Law Center <br />
</strong>The Southern Environmental Law Center is the only regional nonprofit using the power of the law to protect the health and environment of the Southeast (Virginia, Tennessee, North and South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama). Founded in 1986, SELC's team of 40 legal experts represent more than 100 partner groups on issues of climate change and energy, air and water quality, forests, the coast and wetlands, transportation, and land use. <br />
WEB: </span><a href="http://www.SouthernEnvironment.org"><span style="font-size: smaller">www.SouthernEnvironment.org</span></a><span style="font-size: smaller"> &nbsp;<br />
TWITTER: </span><a href="http://www.twitter.com/selc_org"><span style="font-size: smaller">http://www.twitter.com/selc_org</span></a><span style="font-size: smaller">&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2012-01-20T18:15:07+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>SELC and Former DEQ Director Bob Burnley Respond to Gov. McDonnell’s Announcement on Uranium Mining</title>
      <link>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/2012-01-19_selc_statement_gov_uranium/</link>
      <guid>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/2012-01-19_selc_statement_gov_uranium/#When:20:30:52Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today, Governor McDonnell announced that he will ask the General Assembly not to take any action this legislative session on uranium mining.</p>
<p>Bob Burnley, the former director of the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, responded, &quot;It is encouraging that the Governor has elected to keep the mining ban in place.&nbsp; At the same time, the details of the announcement raise some concerns.&quot; Mr. Burnley is serving as an independent consultant to the Southern Environmental Law Center on this issue.</p>
<p>On December 19th, the National Academy of Sciences released a report raising serious questions as to whether uranium could ever be mined safely in Virginia.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Cale Jaffe, senior attorney with the Southern Environmental Law Center, stated, &quot;Given the significant warnings from the National Academy of Sciences, I think what we are seeing is that Virginia Uranium, Inc. lacks sufficient support in the General Assembly to move its agenda forward.&quot;</p>
<p>Burnley added, &quot;The National Academy of Sciences report provides convincing evidence that uranium mining, milling, and waste disposal would be impractical in Virginia.&quot;</p>
<p>The Southern Environmental Law Center and Mr. Burnley also questioned the fiscal prudence of the Governor's approach, given that state agencies currently have no budget or staff devoted to uranium mining.&nbsp; As the NAS concluded that &quot;the state has essentially no experience regulating uranium mining...&quot; [NAS Report, p. 179]</p>
<p>Jaffe stated, &quot;DEQ is struggling to fund its existing obligations.&nbsp; The Governor's budget, for example, calls for transferring the clean air program to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency unless stakeholders can reach an agreement to increase fees.&quot;&nbsp; Burnley added, &quot;There are staffing shortages due to hiring freezes; there are already serious budget constraints at state agencies.&quot;<br />
&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2012-01-19T20:30:52+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Agreement Cuts Pollution by Retiring Dirty, Old Coal Plants in Carolinas</title>
      <link>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/agreement_cuts_pollution_by_retiring_dirty_old_coal_plants_in_carolinas/</link>
      <guid>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/agreement_cuts_pollution_by_retiring_dirty_old_coal_plants_in_carolinas/#When:20:54:02Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Conservation groups today announced a settlement with Duke Energy that will cut pollution by phasing out over 1600 megawatts of dirty, old coal-fired power while still meeting customers&rsquo; energy needs. <br />
<br />
The groups reached settlement in an administrative challenge to the state-issued air pollution permit for construction and operation of a new coal-fired unit at Duke Energy&rsquo;s Cliffside power plant near Shelby, N.C. The Southern Environmental Law Center negotiated the settlement on behalf of Environmental Defense Fund, National Parks Conservation Association, Sierra Club, and Southern Alliance for Clean Energy. <br />
<br />
Under the settlement terms, Duke Energy will retire old coal-fired units that lack modern pollution control technology, totaling about 1667 megawatts or more than twice the capacity of the new unit at the Cliffside facility. Duke had previously included these coal-plant retirements in its non-binding, long-range plan submitted each year to the state utilities commission. The settlement agreement makes the planned retirements enforceable, thereby locking in reductions in air and water pollution that harms the health of children and families in the Carolinas. <br />
<br />
As a result of advocacy by the conservation groups and other clean energy advocates, the new Cliffside unit will operate under the most stringent acid gas controls in the United States, with a 99.9 percent reduction in such pollution. Acid gases, such as sulfur dioxide and hydrochloric acid, from coal-fired power plants can cause eye, nose, and respiratory tract irritation and inflammation, chest pain, coughing, nausea, impaired lung function, asthma attacks, and chronic bronchitis. <br />
<br />
The settlement also tightens a permit provision that Duke Energy must demonstrate best practices to decrease toxic air pollution emitted during malfunction, shut down and start up situations. <br />
<br />
Many old power plants operate today without modern pollution controls that are overdue since the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. Over 400 coal- and oil-fired power plants nationwide release in excess of 386,000 tons of hazardous air pollutants into the atmosphere each year that are linked to cancer, heart disease, birth defects, asthma attacks and even premature death. <br />
<br />
Statements from the attorney and groups involved follow: <br />
<br />
&ldquo;This settlement phases out some of the oldest, dirtiest, and most inefficient coal plants in the Carolinas,&rdquo; said John Suttles, a senior attorney at the Southern Environmental Law Center who represented the groups in court. &ldquo;In addition to protecting people&rsquo;s health and saving lives, it also will save ratepayers&rsquo; money by paving the way for a more efficient and sustainable energy future.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
&ldquo;This settlement ends another chapter in the history of polluting coal generation that jeopardizes our health, air and water,&quot; said Michael Regan, director of energy efficiency for Environmental Defense Fund. &quot;In the future, energy conservation and new technologies will provide North Carolina with reliable energy while protecting our families and economy.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
&ldquo;The air quality improvements that will result from this settlement will provide present and future generations with substantially cleaner air in the region,&rdquo; said Don Barger, NPCA&rsquo;s Southeast Regional Director &ldquo;The health of our people and parks, including Great Smoky Mountains National Park in particular, will long bear witness to the benefits realized from transitioning away from coal.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
&ldquo;North Carolina has long been a clean air leader, and today's settlement is another important step forward for the Tarheel State. This settlement is critical for the health of North Carolina's families. Coal-fired electricity is the primary source of toxic mercury pollution and is a leading trigger of asthma attacks. These retirements will allow North Carolina to move beyond coal, and focus on clean energy solutions like solar and offshore wind,&quot; said Mary Anne Hitt, Director of Sierra Club's Beyond Coal campaign. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;We are pleased to finally have a settlement agreement with Duke Energy to offset the enormous amount of carbon dioxide that the Cliffside coal plant will emit over its lifespan,&rdquo; stated Stephen Smith executive director of Southern Alliance for Clean Energy. &ldquo;Duke&rsquo;s old coal plants need to come offline to reduce the company's contribution to climate change while making room for cleaner, more sustainable energy sources.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
### <br />
<br />
<strong><span style="font-size: smaller">About Environment Defense Fund <br />
</span></strong><span style="font-size: smaller">Environmental Defense Fund (edf.org), a leading national nonprofit organization, creates transformational solutions to the most serious environmental problems. EDF links science, economics, law and innovative private-sector partnerships. See twitter.com/EnvDefenseFund&nbsp;and facebook.com/EnvDefenseFund&nbsp;<br />
<br />
<strong>About National Parks Conservation Association <br />
</strong>Since 1919, the nonpartisan, non-profit National Parks Conservation Association has been the leading voice of the American people in protecting and enhancing our National Park System. NPCA, its 340,000 members, and partners work together to protect the park system and preserve our nation&rsquo;s natural, historical, and cultural heritage for our children and grandchildren. <a href="http://www.npca.org">www.npca.org</a> &nbsp;<br />
<br />
<strong>About Sierra Club <br />
</strong>Sierra Club is the nation&rsquo;s largest grassroots environmental organization with over 17,000 members in North Carolina and more than 1.4 million members and supporters nationwide. Since 2002, Sierra Club&rsquo;s Beyond Coal campaign has successfully stopped 161 new coal plant proposals from moving forward, and is working to move our nation beyond coal to a clean, safe energy economy. <br />
<br />
<strong>About Southern Alliance for Clean Energy <br />
</strong>Southern Alliance for Clean Energy is a nonprofit organization that promotes responsible energy choices that create global warming solutions and ensure clean, safe, and healthy communities throughout the Southeast. <a href="http://www.cleanenergy.org">www.cleanenergy.org</a> <br />
<br />
<strong>About the Southern Environmental Law Center</strong> <br />
The Southern Environmental Law Center is a regional nonprofit using the power of the law to protect the health and environment of the Southeast (Virginia, Tennessee, North and South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama). Founded in 1986, SELC's team of more than 40 legal and policy experts represent more than 100 partner groups on issues of climate change and energy, air and water quality, forests, the coast and wetlands, transportation, and land use. <br />
WEB: <a href="http://www.SouthernEnvironment.org">www.SouthernEnvironment.org</a> &nbsp;<br />
TWITTER: <a href="http://www.twitter.com/selc_org">http://www.twitter.com/selc_org</a> &nbsp;</span></p>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2012-01-17T20:54:02+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Case Filed to Protect Wateree River from Coal Waste Contamination</title>
      <link>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/case_filed_to_protect_wateree_river_from_coal_waste_contamination/</link>
      <guid>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/case_filed_to_protect_wateree_river_from_coal_waste_contamination/#When:16:16:04Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On behalf of the Catawba Riverkeeper Foundation, the Southern Environmental Law Center today <a href="/uploads/fck/01-12-12 Catawba Riverkeeper v SCEG Complaint - FINAL.pdf">filed suit </a>to stop contamination of the Wateree River,&nbsp;nearby groundwater, and wetlands by coal ash lagoons of South Carolina Electric and Gas Company in southern Richland County, South Carolina. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;For forty years, these coal ash waste lagoons have been polluting South Carolina&rsquo;s waters,&rdquo; said Frank Holleman, senior attorney at the Southern Environmental Law Center. &ldquo;They&rsquo;re a disaster waiting to happen, perched on the banks of the Wateree River. We&rsquo;re asking SCE&amp;G to clean up its mess and stop discharging arsenic and other toxic pollutants into South Carolina&rsquo;s waters.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
SCE&amp;G&rsquo;s 40 year old lagoons&mdash;holding over 2.4 million tons of wet coal ash waste on the banks of the Wateree River&mdash;have polluted groundwater, wetlands, and the Wateree River with arsenic, a toxic substance and a known carcinogen, and other pollutants. Tests discovered arsenic in the groundwater at 500 times the legal limit, and routinely at over 100 times the legal limit for arsenic.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;We&rsquo;re asking that this toxic pollution be cleaned up,&rdquo; said David Merryman, the Catawba Riverkeeper. &ldquo;We are also acting to ensure that the public has a say in the pollution of some of our most important public natural resources &ndash; groundwater, the Wateree River, and wetlands.&rdquo; The Catawba River&rsquo;s name changes to the Wateree River at Lake Wateree.<br />
<br />
Information from DHEC files shows polluted groundwater flows directly into the Wateree River. At times, the coal ash lagoons have also directly leaked and discharged arsenic-contaminated pollutants into the Wateree River. <br />
<br />
The coal ash lagoons are unlined earthen structures holding millions of tons of coal ash sludge. Their location on the Wateree River raises the risk of a major environmental disaster for nearby and downriver communities. Just before 1 a.m. on December 22, 2008, the failure of a TVA lagoon sent coal ash waste tearing through nearby family homes and contaminated the Emory River in Tennessee, upriver from Chattanooga. <br />
<br />
While SCE&amp;G has a permit from the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control for a discharge point of overflow waters from its finishing pond, it has never obtained a permit from DHEC for its discharges of arsenic and other pollutants into the groundwater and wetlands and its discharges of pollutants into the Wateree River through the leaks in the lagoons. <br />
<br />
Under the South Carolina Pollution Control Act, the public must be given notice of a permit application, have a chance to comment or participate in public hearings, and ultimately the public can seek review of a permit in the courts. SCE&amp;G avoided public comment, scrutiny and review by the courts by not seeking a permit. The Pollution Control Act allows members of the public, like the Catawba Riverkeeper Foundation, to bring suit when a polluter like SCE&amp;G fails to obtain a permit. <br />
<br />
Without a public process, SCE&amp;G entered into private agreements with DHEC in 2001 and 2011, but not permits. The 2001 private agreement only required SCE&amp;G to monitor its pollution. In the nonbinding 2011 private agreement; SCE&amp;G indicates an intention to empty the coal ash lagoons ten years from now, but can back out at any time with 30 days notice. There was no public notice of the 2011 nonbinding agreement, and the agreements were not subject to public participation or comment. <br />
<br />
The suit was filed in U.S. District Court in Columbia. It asks that SCE&amp;G be ordered to stop dumping more coal ash waste into the lagoons, empty the lagoons as soon as reasonably possible, store its coal ash waste outside the floodway and floodplain of the Wateree River in an appropriately lined landfill, and remediate its contamination of the groundwater and stop its discharges of arsenic and other pollutants into the Wateree River. <br />
<br />
### <br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: smaller"><strong>About the Catawba Riverkeeper Foundation</strong> <br />
The Catawba Riverkeeper Foundation is a nonprofit organization with members in South and North Carolina that works to protect and restore the Catawba/Wateree River and its watershed. <br />
<br />
<strong>About the Southern Environmental Law Center</strong> <br />
The Southern Environmental Law Center is a regional nonprofit using the power of the law to protect the health and environment of the Southeast (Virginia, Tennessee, North and South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama). Founded in 1986, SELC's team of more than 40 legal and policy experts represent more than 100 partner groups on issues of climate change and energy, air and water quality, forests, the coast and wetlands, transportation, and land use. <br />
<u>WEB: www.SouthernEnvironment.org <br />
TWITTER: </u></span><u><a href="http://www.twitter.com/selc_org"><span style="font-size: smaller">http://www.twitter.com/selc_org</span></a></u><span style="font-size: smaller"><br />
</span></p>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2012-01-12T16:16:04+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>First air standards slash levels of mercury and other toxins</title>
      <link>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/first_air_standards_slash_levels_of_mercury_and_other_toxins/</link>
      <guid>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/first_air_standards_slash_levels_of_mercury_and_other_toxins/#When:17:07:56Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>EPA today provided long overdue and vitally important health protections for American families and children by issuing standards for toxic air pollution from power plants, said the Southern Environmental Law Center. The Southern Environmental Law Center represents the American Nurses Association and Physicians for Social Responsibility in the case that led to the court order directing the Environmental Protection Agency to end more than a decade of delay on requiring coal- and oil-fired power plants to reduce their toxic mercury emissions. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;As the largest unregulated sources of mercury and dozens of other highly toxic air pollutants, coal-fired power plants endanger the health and well-being of children and pregnant women every day,&rdquo; said John Suttles, senior attorney at the Southern Environmental Law Center. &ldquo;The national standards EPA announced today establish sensible, achievable health protections for all Americans. These standards are a huge victory for families and children as they will slash levels of mercury and other toxic air pollution that disproportionately harm kids.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
Power plants are the nation&rsquo;s largest unregulated source of mercury pollution, and unnecessarily emit enormous quantities of lead, arsenic and other highly toxic chemicals. <br />
<br />
On November 8, 2011, Dow Jones reported that Jim Rogers, chief executive of Duke Energy called the new air pollution standards for coal-fired power plants within the proposed timeline &ldquo;tight but achievable.&rdquo; Mr. Rogers&rsquo;s statement corroborates EPA&rsquo;s own findings. <br />
<br />
EPA has reported that using available and affordable &ldquo;maximum achievable control technology&rdquo; (MACT) for power plants will prevent up to 11,000 premature deaths, 4,700 heart attacks and 130,000 asthma attacks annually. <br />
<br />
Children and women of childbearing age are at particular risk from excessive power plant mercury pollution. All 50 states, and one U.S. territory, have declared fish advisories warning people about mercury contamination. <br />
<br />
Mercury puts children at risk for impaired brain function, neurological problems, and reduced IQ. Hundreds of thousands of American children born every year are at risk of developmental damage because of elevated mercury levels in their mothers&rsquo; bodies. <br />
<br />
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, eight percent of American women of childbearing age have mercury in their bodies at levels high enough to put their babies at risk of birth defects, loss of IQ, learning disabilities and developmental problems. <br />
<br />
Approximately 1,350 coal-fired units at more than 525 existing power plants spew some 70,000 pounds of mercury into the air each year. Much of the mercury and other metals in the air toxics plume fall within 100 miles of the power plant source, and mercury accumulates up the food chain in fish and in the animals that consume it. In addition to human health effects, significant adverse effects on wildlife also have been linked to power plant mercury. <br />
<br />
### <br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: smaller">The Southern Environmental Law Center is a regional nonprofit using the power of the law to protect the health and environment of the Southeast (Virginia, Tennessee, North and South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama). Founded in 1986, SELC's team of more than 40 legal and policy experts represent more than 100 partner groups on issues of climate change and energy, air and water quality, forests, the coast and wetlands, transportation, and land use. <br />
WEB: </span><a href="http://www.SouthernEnvironment.org"><span style="font-size: smaller">www.SouthernEnvironment.org</span></a><span style="font-size: smaller"> &nbsp;<br />
TWITTER: </span><a href="http://www.twitter.com/selc_org"><span style="font-size: smaller">http://www.twitter.com/selc_org</span></a><span style="font-size: smaller">&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2011-12-21T17:07:56+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>
