<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>SELC Press Releases</title>
    <link>http://southernenvironment.cat4dev.com</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>bkenion@selcnc.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2010</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-08-27T21:11:52-05:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://expressionengine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>Ruling Opens Season on N. C. Trout Streams for Golf Course Developers</title>
      <link>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/court_reversal_muddies_n_c_trout_streams_and_water_quality/</link>
      <guid>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/court_reversal_muddies_n_c_trout_streams_and_water_quality/#When:21:11:52Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In a loss for N.C. trout, water quality and sportsmen, the N.C. Supreme Court today ruled six to one that a country club golf course&rsquo;s razing of forested buffer areas along sensitive trout streams and permanent enclosure of a N.C. mountain stream within a pipe was allowed despite a state law requiring &ldquo;undisturbed&rdquo; buffers to protect trout streams and water quality, according to the Southern Environmental Law Center. The Supreme Court decision reversed an earlier N.C. Appeals Court decision that a golf course constructed at Mountain Air Country Club in Yancey County violated state buffer requirements for trout streams. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;This decision slashes long-standing protections for North Carolina&rsquo;s valuable trout streams and threatens to turn every undisturbed trout buffer in North Carolina into a golf course or parking lot and every mountain stream into a piped ditch,&rdquo; said Blan Holman, a senior attorney at the Southern Environmental Law Center. &ldquo;Clean trout streams are essential to North Carolina&rsquo;s mountain heritage and vital for an economy powered by outdoor recreational activities. Allowing forested buffers to be leveled for golf courses will make trout streams the only state waters that can be muddied by big development.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
The Court&rsquo;s decision leaves vulnerable thousands of miles of designated trout streams across the state. According to a dissenting opinion written by Justice Robin E. Hudson, the majority decision unilaterally removes trout stream protections that the General Assembly enacted decades ago. Justice Hudson points out that the majority &ldquo;reads trout water protection provisions out of the [Sedimentation Pollution Control] Act.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
Piping trout streams and denaturalizing the areas next to those streams is a recurring part of proposals for developments in North Carolina&rsquo;s Appalachian Mountains, especially for mountaintop luxury golf courses. The Mountain Air golf course impacts thousands of feet of stream because the mountainside trout stream running through it was reshaped and severely modified to accommodate fairways and greens. <br />
<br />
Numerous studies show that vegetated buffers prevent sedimentation and warming of mountain streams, which in their natural state run cold and clear. The trout buffer requirement was enacted by the N.C. General Assembly in 1989. That legislative effort was led Western North Carolina legislators seeking to give trout streams particularly strong buffer protections because trout require clean, cold water to thrive, and are impacted severely by the increased silt and temperature from streamside development. <br />
<br />
The Southern Environmental Law Center represented the non-profit Clean Water for North Carolina and two downstream landowners in this case whose trout stream turned muddy and brown during construction of the golf course. <br />
<br />
### <br />
<br />
<strong><span style="font-size: smaller">Note to editors:</span></strong><span style="font-size: smaller">&nbsp;<br />
<span id="1282944016577S" style="display: none">&nbsp;</span><span id="1282944019013S" style="display: none">&nbsp;</span><span id="1282944020468S" style="display: none">&nbsp;</span><span id="1282944023058S" style="display: none">&nbsp;</span><span id="1282944023572S" style="display: none">&nbsp;</span><span id="1282944025948S" style="display: none">&nbsp;</span><span id="1282944027075S" style="display: none">&nbsp;</span><span id="1282944028544S" style="display: none">&nbsp;</span>&bull; A map showing state designated trout streams is available for press reports based on this release if appropriate citation is given. Contact: ksullivan@selcnc.org<br />
<br />
<strong>About Southern Environmental Law Center <br />
</strong>The Southern Environmental Law Center is a regional nonprofit using the power of the law to protect the health and environment of the Southeast (Virginia, Tennessee, North and South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama). Founded in 1986, SELC's team of 40 legal experts represent more than 100 partner groups on issues of climate change and energy, air and water quality, forests, the coast and wetlands, transportation, and land use. <br />
WEB: <u>www.SouthernEnvironment.org </u><br />
TWITTER: </span><u><span style="font-size: smaller">http://www.twitter.com/selc_org </span></u></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2010-08-27T21:11:52-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Nesting birds and sea turtles break records at Cape Hatteras National Seashore</title>
      <link>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/nesting_birds_and_sea_turtles_break_records_at_cape_hatteras_national_seash/</link>
      <guid>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/nesting_birds_and_sea_turtles_break_records_at_cape_hatteras_national_seash/#When:18:56:32Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>With the breeding season still underway, 2010 is already a record-breaking year for rare sea turtles and waterbirds that nest on beaches at Cape Hatteras National Seashore, according to preliminary numbers from the National Park Service. <br />
<br />
According to the National Seashore&rsquo;s August 23, 2010 press release, 147 sea turtle nests have been recorded to date, the most nests ever documented at the seashore and part of 835 nests reported statewide this year (as of today) by the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission. The previous record at the seashore was 111 nests in 2008. The numbers may increase as the 2010 turtle nesting season continues for several more weeks. <br />
<br />
Additionally, a record 15 piping plover chicks survived to fledge or learn to fly, the highest number ever documented since record-keeping began in 1992. Before current off-road vehicle management practices were implemented in April 2008, piping plover numbers within Cape Hatteras National Seashore declined to an all-time low of no chicks surviving to fledging in 2002 and 2004. The population of piping plovers that nest at Cape Hatteras is listed as &ldquo;threatened&rdquo; under the federal Endangered Species Act. <br />
<br />
Likewise, 25 American oystercatcher chicks fledged from the Seashore&rsquo;s beaches in 2010, with one unfledged chick remaining. An additional four chicks fledged on the Seashore&rsquo;s uninhabited Green Island. This is the highest number of fledged chicks for that sensitive species reported at the Seashore since records have been kept.<br />
<br />
Under an April 2008 consent decree, off-road vehicle (ORV) use is restricted in designated bird and turtle nesting areas on the seashore during their nesting seasons. The consent decree employs science-based protection measures that provide the minimum buffer distances needed to protect nesting birds and chicks from vehicles and human disturbance, as well as restrictions on night driving that are vital for nesting sea turtles. <br />
<br />
Although a variety of factors including weather and predators can affect nesting success, scientific research, including the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service recovery plan for the loggerhead sea turtle, confirms the importance of limiting ORV driving in turtle nesting areas. <br />
<br />
The number of sea turtle nests at Cape Hatteras constitutes 17.6 percent of all the nests laid in North Carolina in 2010 to date, as compared to only 11.5 percent in 2000-2007, the eight years immediately prior to current beach driving protections going into effect. The U.S. Fish &amp; Wildlife Service has set a recovery goal of 200 loggerhead sea turtles at Cape Hatteras National Seashore. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;We are heartened by these impressive nesting numbers,&rdquo; said Walker Golder, deputy director of Audubon North Carolina. &ldquo;The unique waterbirds and sea turtles that depend on Cape Hatteras are a vital part of what makes the Seashore a national treasure. These nesting numbers illustrate that vehicles and wildlife can share the beach as long as sound, science-based protection measures are in place.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
&ldquo;The success of this nesting season underscores the need for a long-term ORV management plan at the Seashore,&rdquo; said Jason Rylander, staff attorney for Defenders of Wildlife. &ldquo;Our parks should be safe places for wildlife in addition to providing recreational opportunities for visitors.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
&ldquo;Human disturbance is a primary factor in beach nesting success that is largely within the control of the Park Service,&rdquo; said Julie Youngman, senior attorney at the Southern Environmental Law Center. &ldquo;We believe the effective management of beach driving contributed to this year&rsquo;s tremendous success.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
The National Park Service is developing a final ORV management plan for Cape Hatteras National Seashore that must be implemented by April 2011. In May 2010, Southern Environmental Law Center, Defenders of Wildlife, and Audubon North Carolina submitted comments to the National Park service that outlined several measures necessary for the Park Service to meet its legal mandates to conserve and protect the natural resources of the seashore, leave them unimpaired for future generations, and provide an appropriate balance between continued ORV use and other public uses of the Seashore, including pedestrian and family use and wildlife conservation. Collectively, these organizations represent 1.5 million members and supporters. <br />
<br />
### <br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: smaller">Note to editors: <br />
2009 annual reports on protected species management at Cape Hatteras National Seashore <u>http://parkplanning.nps.gov/document.cfm?parkID=358&amp;projectID=13331&amp;documentID=31872<br />
</u><br />
North Carolina WRC Sea Turtle Project nesting statistics <br />
<a href="http://www.seaturtle.org/nestdb/index.shtml?view=1">http://www.seaturtle.org/nestdb/index.shtml?view=1</a> <br />
<br />
National Park Service Release, Aug. 23, 2010: &ldquo;Bodie Island Spit and Ramp 23 on Hatteras Island Reopen to ORV Access&rdquo; <br />
<a href="http://www.nps.gov/caha/parknews/bodie-island-spit-ramp-23-reopen.htm">http://www.nps.gov/caha/parknews/bodie-island-spit-ramp-23-reopen.htm</a> <br />
<br />
<u>National Park Service Release: &ldquo;Cape Hatteras National Seashore Resource Management Field Summary for August 12&ndash; August 18, 2010&rdquo; </u><br />
<a href="http://www.preservehatteras.org/index.php?page=more-information">http://www.preservehatteras.org/index.php?page=more-information</a> <br />
<br />
Recovery Plan for the Northwest Atlantic Population of the Loggerhead Sea Turtle (Caretta caretta) Second Revision <br />
<a href="http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/recovery/plans.htm">http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/recovery/plans.htm</a><br />
<br />
Loggerhead Sea Turtle (Caretta caretta) 2009 Status Review under the U.S. Endangered Species Act <br />
<a href="http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/statusreviews/loggerheadturtle2009.pdf">http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/statusreviews/loggerheadturtle2009.pdf</a><br />
<br />
Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation <br />
<a href="http://www.fws.gov/northeast/endangered/PDF/Piping_Plover_five_year_review_and_summary.pdf">http://www.fws.gov/northeast/endangered/PDF/Piping_Plover_five_year_review_and_summary.pdf</a><br />
<br />
Piping Plover, Atlantic Coast Population: 1996 Revised Recovery Plan <br />
<a href="http://www.fws.gov/northeast/pipingplover/recovery.html">http://www.fws.gov/northeast/pipingplover/recovery.html</a><br />
<br />
American Oystercatcher Conservation Plan for the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts of the United States <br />
<a href="http://www.nbii.gov/images/uploaded/8496_1157743009969_OystercatcherConserv.pdf">http://www.nbii.gov/images/uploaded/8496_1157743009969_OystercatcherConserv.pdf</a><br />
<br />
Conservation Plan for the American Oystercatcher (Haematopus palliates) through the Western Hemisphere, Version 1.1 February 2010 <u><a href="http://www.whsrn.org/sites/default/files/file/American_Oystercatcher_Hemispheric_Conservation_Plan_10_02-28_v1.1.pdf">http://www.whsrn.org/sites/default/files/file/American_Oystercatcher_Hemispheric_Conservation_Plan_10_02-28_v1.1.pdf</a><br />
<br />
</u>Audubon North Carolina is the state office of the National Audubon Society representing 10,000 grassroots members and nine local chapters across the state. With a century of conservation history in North Carolina, Audubon strives to conserve and restore the habitats we share with all wildlife, focusing on the needs of birds. Audubon North Carolina achieves its mission through a blend of science-based research and conservation, education and outreach, and advocacy. <br />
<a href="http://www.ncaudubon.org">www.ncaudubon.org</a><br />
<br />
Defenders of Wildlife is dedicated to the protection of all native animals and plants in their natural communities. With more than 1 million members, supporters and subscribers, Defenders of Wildlife is a leading advocate for innovative solutions to safeguard our wildlife heritage for generations to come. <u>www.defenders.org<br />
</u><br />
The Southern Environmental Law Center is the only regional nonprofit using the power of the law to protect the health and environment of the Southeast (Virginia, Tennessee, North and South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama). Founded in 1986, SELC's team of 40 legal experts represent more than 100 partner groups on issues of climate change and energy, air and water quality, forests, the coast and wetlands, transportation, and land use. <br />
<a href="http://www.SouthernEnvironment.org">www.SouthernEnvironment.org</a> </span></p>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2010-08-25T18:56:32-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Court victory greets returning plovers</title>
      <link>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/court_victory_greets_returning_plovers_8_17_10/</link>
      <guid>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/court_victory_greets_returning_plovers_8_17_10/#When:17:39:41Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Summary: <br />
<br />
&bull;A federal judge today ruled in favor of designating critical habitat areas for the wintering piping plover in North Carolina in compliance with the Endangered Species Act (ESA). <br />
<br />
&bull;Defenders of Wildlife and the National Audubon Society, represented by the Southern Environmental Law Center, intervened in the case on behalf of the Interior Department and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. <br />
<br />
&bull;The piping plover has been listed as a threatened species under the ESA since 1986. The beaches of North Carolina play a vital role in all stages of their life cycle. <br />
<br />
The following are statements from Defenders of Wildlife, the National Audubon Society and the Southern Environmental Law Center: <br />
<br />
&ldquo;Cape Hatteras is unique. It&rsquo;s one of the few places on the east coast that hosts piping plover activity all year round,&rdquo; said Jason Rylander, staff attorney for Defenders of Wildlife. &ldquo;Critical habitat designation will provide a crucial, additional layer of protection throughout the year.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
&ldquo;This is a great victory for piping plovers and reaffirms the importance of Cape Hatteras National Seashore for this threatened species.&rdquo; said Walker Golder, deputy director of Audubon North Carolina. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;The decision completely affirms the Fish and Wildlife Service&#8217;s efforts to designate habitat necessary for recovery of the piping plover,&rdquo; said Julie Youngman, senior attorney at the Southern Environmental Law Center. &ldquo;The additional legal protection for this threatened species comes at a critical time for its survival.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
Please see attachment for Judge Lamberth&rsquo;s opinion. <br />
<br />
### <br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: smaller"><strong>About Defenders of Wildlife</strong><br />
<br />
Defenders of Wildlife is dedicated to the protection of all native animals and plants in their natural communities. With more than 1 million members, supporters and subscribers, Defenders of Wildlife is a leading advocate for innovative solutions to safeguard our wildlife heritage for generations to come. www.defenders.org <br />
<br />
<strong>About Audubon North Carolina</strong><br />
<br />
Audubon North Carolina is the state office of the National Audubon Society representing 10,000 grassroots members and nine local chapters across the state. With a century of conservation history in North Carolina, Audubon strives to conserve and restore the habitats we share with all wildlife, focusing on the needs of birds. Audubon North Carolina achieves its mission through a blend of science-based research and conservation, education and outreach, and advocacy. www.ncaudubon.org <br />
<br />
<strong>About the Southern Environmental Law Center </strong><br />
<br />
The Southern Environmental Law Center is the only regional nonprofit using the power of the law to protect the health and environment of the Southeast (Virginia, Tennessee, North and South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama). Founded in 1986, SELC&#8217;s team of 40 legal experts represent more than 100 partner groups on issues of climate change and energy, air and water quality, forests, the coast and wetlands, transportation, and land use. <br />
<br />
WEB: www.SouthernEnvironment.org <br />
<br />
TWITTER: http://www.twitter.com/selc_org </span>
</p>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2010-08-25T17:39:41-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>SCDOT Planners Ignore Better, Cheaper Alternative to Mark Clark Expressway</title>
      <link>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/2010_07_28_mark_clark_deis_released/</link>
      <guid>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/2010_07_28_mark_clark_deis_released/#When:11:19:48Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The draft report released today by the South Carolina Department of Transportation, which describes the environmental impacts of the proposed Mark Clark Expressway, fails to consider alternatives that are far less harmful and less costly than building a major interstate through communities, open-space areas, and marshes west of the Ashley River in the Stono River watershed.</p>
<p>SCDOT is proposing to construct a four-lane highway that extends I-526 approximately seven miles from Savannah Highway to the James Island Expressway.&nbsp; At a cost of $489 million, or more, the project would consume significant public funds but do little or nothing to reduce traffic congestion. In fact, according to an analysis by the Coastal Conservation League, Savannah Highway and Folly Road would still have failing levels of service with the I-526 extension completed.</p>
<p>The highway would include two major river crossings, threatening the water quality of the Stono River and Wappoo Creek watershed. Further, it would encourage sprawl development southwest of Charleston, bringing more traffic, tailpipe emissions and polluted stormwater runoff to the region, especially Johns Island.</p>
<p>The Coastal Conservation League and Southern Environmental Law Center, along with many concerned citizens, have for years advocated for new or improved solutions to traffic in the region. Solutions that cost less, pose less of an environmental threat, and that actually enhance economic opportunities and quality of life for the affected communities are sorely needed. The League's innovative &quot;A New Way to Work&quot; proposal establishes a network of connected streets to take much of the traffic off Savannah Highway and other busy roads, while redeveloping suburban areas to bring jobs, shopping, and services closer to residents. It would cost approximately half as much as the Mark Clark Expressway.</p>
<p>The SCDOT's draft environmental impact statement, however, completely ignores this proposal and any of the alternative solutions it offers.</p>
<p>&quot;As a regional organization, we see a lot of highway proposals in the South like this one - projects that hearken back to the 1950s and 60s when building bypasses and beltlines was the sole solution,&quot; said SELC Senior Attorney Chris DeScherer.&nbsp; &quot;We now understand how these massive projects backfire - pushing sprawl further out, pushing our infrastructure to the limit, chewing up farms and wetlands.&quot;</p>
<p>&quot;Other alternatives embody the new national trend and policy of livable community design,&quot; said Josh Martin, CCL Land Use director. &quot;Wisely reworking existing areas before developing new land; wisely focusing on a diversity of travel modes; wisely returning to town and village patterns proven through the years is possible through this alternative.&nbsp; This is the emerging vision nationwide and could be the vision here in Charleston County. It is truly unfortunate that the SCDOT's preferred alternative does not reflect this emerging vision.&quot;</p>
<p><br />
DeScherer said that SCDOT's failure to include alternatives along the lines of the &quot;New Way to Work&quot; concept is legally flawed, since federal law requires agencies to consider all reasonable alternatives that meet the need and purpose of the project. Instead, SCDOT and the other agencies have only considered differently routed and designed highways, and used a computer model showing traffic results for those, refusing to use a different model that would account for the traffic benefits of the conservation groups' proposal.</p>
<p><br />
****************************</p>
<p>The Coastal Conservation League is a grassroots non-profit conservation organization, founded in 1989 to protect the natural environment of the South Carolina coastal plain and to enhance the quality of life of our coastal communities. The League works with individuals, businesses, and government to ensure balanced solutions.&nbsp; WEB: <a href="http://www.coastalconservationleague.org">www.coastalconservationleague.org</a><br />
Facebook Fan Page: Coastal Conservation League <br />
TWITTER: <a href="http://www.twitter/scccl">http://www.twitter/scccl</a></p>
<p>The Southern Environmental Law Center is a regional nonprofit using the power of the law to protect the health and environment of the Southeast (Virginia, Tennessee, North and South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama). Founded in 1986, SELC's team of 40 legal experts represent more than 100 partner groups on issues of climate change and energy, air and water quality, forests, the coast and wetlands, transportation, and land use.<br />
WEB: <a href="http://www.SouthernEnvironment.org">www.SouthernEnvironment.org</a><br />
FACEBOOK: <a href="http://www.fanofselc.org">http://www.fanofselc.org</a><br />
TWITTER: <a href="http://www.twitter.com/selc_org">http://www.twitter.com/selc_org</a></p>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2010-07-28T11:19:48-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Water Permits for Georgia Coal Plant are Invalid</title>
      <link>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/2010_07_26_plantwashington_ruling_water_permits/</link>
      <guid>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/2010_07_26_plantwashington_ruling_water_permits/#When:11:36:55Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Public interest groups have won a key legal challenge to two state water permits for the proposed 850-megawatt Plant Washington coal-fired power plant in Sandersville, GA.&nbsp; A Georgia administrative court has ruled that the water withdrawal and water pollution discharge permits issued by Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD) for the proposed power plant are both legally flawed.</p>
<p>In a ruling issued Friday evening (<a href="/uploads/fck/file/plant%20washington/plant-washington-ruling-water-permits07-23-2010.PDF">see PDF file here</a>), Administrative Law Judge Ronit Walker said EPD failed to follow proper procedure for interbasin transfers in allowing Power4Georgians, LLC to withdraw an average of 13.5 million gallons per day from the Oconee River for use at the plant, located in the Ogeechee River watershed, and return only 11 percent of that water to the Oconee.&nbsp;</p>
<p>On the wastewater permit, the judge ruled that EPD erred in allowing pollutants to be monitored and regulated within the facility, rather than at the point of discharge into the Oconee River as required by the Clean Water Act.&nbsp; Chlorine, chromium and zinc are among the pollutants of concern from the coal plant.</p>
<p>Plant Washington is a project of Power4Georgians, a company organized by Cobb Electrical Membership Corporation and four other electric cooperatives.</p>
<p>In the challenges to the state water permits, GreenLaw and the Southern Environmental Law Center are representing the Altamaha Riverkeeper, the Fall-line Alliance for a Clean Environment, and Sierra Club's Georgia Chapter.</p>
<p>&quot;Exactly how valuable our water resources are has been brought home to Georgians in recent years,&quot; said Brian Gist, senior attorney at the Southern Environmental Law Center. &quot;For all of us who rely on the ready availability of clean water, it's critical that large industrial users comply with laws meant to protect shared water resources and ensure fair, efficient use.&quot;</p>
<p>&quot;This decision will have a profound impact on water use in Georgia.&nbsp; We must engage in growth that is based on the resources we actually have, not the resources we wish we had.&nbsp; No longer can one water user take water from one basin and use it in another basin without considering whether or not there is better use of those water resources in the basin,&quot; said Justine Thompson, executive director of GreenLaw.</p>
<p>&quot;Downstream communities like Dublin, local farms, and wildlife all depend on clean water and a healthy flow in the Oconee River system,&quot; said Deborah Sheppard, executive director of the Altamaha Riverkeeper. &quot;We're very encouraged that the judge looked closely at these issues and ruled in our favor.&quot;</p>
<p>&quot;Withdrawing millions and millions of gallons of water will devastate this river ecosystem over time. We have to make smarter choices about managing our water resources, including how we get and use electricity,&quot; said Katherine Cummings, board member of the Fall-line Alliance for a Clean Environment.</p>
<p>&quot;We are grateful that the Judge ruled against this attempt to take water from the Oconee River Basin and use it to build an expensive and unnecessary dirty coal plant in the Ogeechee River Basin.&nbsp; It is time for Cobb EMC and the other co-ops to stop pushing this coal plant on rural Georgia, and time to start saving money through water and energy conservation measures. Efficiency can meet our water and energy needs,&quot; said Erin Glynn, Associate Field Organizer for the Georgia Sierra Club.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The order addressed a number of issues pending before the court.&nbsp; Any appeals must be filed within thirty days.&nbsp;</p>
<p>###</p>
<p>About GreenLaw <br />
GreenLaw is dedicated to preventing air and water pollution that endangers human health and degrades Georgia's natural resources. GreenLaw achieves these goals by providing free high quality legal and technical assistance to environmental organizations and community groups throughout Georgia. <a href="http://www.green-law.org">www.green-law.org</a><br />
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/grrrlaw">http://www.twitter.com/grrrlaw</a></p>
<p>About the Southern Environmental Law Center<br />
The Southern Environmental Law Center is the only regional nonprofit using the power of the law to protect the health and environment of the Southeast (Virginia, Tennessee, North and South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama). Founded in 1986, SELC's team of 40 legal experts represent more than 100 partner groups on issues of climate change and energy, air and water quality, forests, the coast and wetlands, transportation, and land use. <br />
WEB: <a href="http://www.SouthernEnvironment.org">www.SouthernEnvironment.org</a> <br />
FACEBOOK: <a href="http://www.fanofselc.org">http://www.fanofselc.org</a> <br />
TWITTER: <a href="http://www.twitter.com/selc_org">http://www.twitter.com/selc_org</a></p>
<p>About Altamaha Riverkeeper<br />
The Altamaha Riverkeeper is working to protect and restore the habitat, water quality, and flow of the mighty Altamaha from its headwaters in the Oconee, Ocmulgee, and Ohoopee Rivers to its terminus at the Atlantic Coast. Website: <a href="http://www.altamahariverkeeper.org">www.altamahariverkeeper.org</a><br />
For more information contact: Deborah Sheppard, executive director, (912) 230-3119</p>
<p>About Fall-line Alliance for a Clean Environment<br />
Fall-line Alliance for a Clean Environment (FACE) brings together citizens and community to protect and preserve our air, water and land from pollution so that we may live and grow in the beautiful hills and farmland of Georgia. <a href="http://www.facenvironment.org">www.facenvironment.org</a><br />
For more information contact: Katherine Cummings, FACE board member&nbsp; (478) 232-8010</p>
<p>About Sierra Club<br />
Sierra Club, the oldest and largest grassroots environmental organization in the United States, has over 20,000 members and supporters in the state of Georgia. <a href="http://www.sierraclub.org/coal">www.sierraclub.org/coal</a> <br />
For more information contact: Erin Glynn, regional conservation organizer, (770) 598-6814<br />
&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2010-07-26T11:36:55-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Downstream Users and River Advocates Challenge Paper Mill Permit</title>
      <link>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/permit_allows_continued_pollution_of_pigeon_river/</link>
      <guid>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/permit_allows_continued_pollution_of_pigeon_river/#When:15:18:27Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Downstream users and river advocates today challenged a North Carolina Division of Water Quality wastewater permit that fails to require adequate reductions in color and thermal pollutants being discharged by the Blue Ridge Paper Products mill into the Pigeon River in Haywood County, North Carolina, about 40 miles from the Tennessee border. <br />
<br />
The N.C. permit allows the paper mill to discharge wastewater into the Pigeon River that raises the temperature of the river beyond the limits allowed by state water quality standards. In 2007, the death of at least 8000 fish near the paper mill was attributed to high water temperatures. Despite the threat that heated plant wastewater poses to fish and other aquatic life in the river, the permit only sets a monthly average temperature limit as measured nearly half a mile downstream, but sets no limits on daily fluctuations, and thus allows temperature spikes that can significantly exceed state temperature standards. <br />
<br />
The coalition also challenged the adequacy of improvements to the discoloration of the river allowed by the permit. They argue that the discoloration of the Pigeon River and pollutants from the plant harm other enterprises that rely on a healthy river, including recreational fishing, boating, and related tourism. <br />
<br />
The Southern Environmental Law Center filed the challenge today in the North Carolina Office of Administrative Hearings in Raleigh on behalf of Clean Water Expected for East Tennessee, Clean Water for North Carolina, Cocke County, Tennessee, the Tennessee Chapter of the Sierra Club, Tennessee Conservation Voters, Tennessee Scenic Rivers Association and Western North Carolina Alliance. <br />
<br />
Comments from these groups follow. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;North Carolina failed to require real progress in restoring the river&rsquo;s health and downstream recreational uses,&rdquo; said Hope Taylor, executive director of Clean Water for North Carolina, which led a 2001 joint study for process improvements at the mill. Instead of requiring water improvements &ldquo;at the quickest possible pace,&rdquo; as required by a historic 1997 Settlement Agreement with the mill, Taylor points out, &ldquo;this permit prolongs a 102-year injustice by failing to mandate feasible steps towards restoring the river.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
&ldquo;The discoloration of the river as well as the levels of pollutants make the river less desirable for recreational fishermen and boaters than other, less polluted rivers nearby,&rdquo; Iliff McMahan, Jr., Mayor of Cocke County, Tennessee explains. &ldquo;Citizens downstream from the plant are being deprived of high quality recreational experiences, as well as a healthy environment to develop their businesses and raise their families, because the paper mill refuses to take steps to clean up the Pigeon River. We feel the permit&rsquo;s terms do not represent meaningful progress under the 1997 settlement agreement or the Clean Water Act of 1972. And for us, after 102 years of continuous pollution from this paper mill, that is not acceptable.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
&ldquo;The high temperatures and temperature fluctuations allowed under the new permit will not ensure safeguards are in place to prevent future fish kills,&rdquo; said Hartwell Carson, French Broad RiverKeeper with WNCA. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;Additional improvement could be achieved with existing technology and without serious consequences to the local economy,&rdquo; said Amelia Taylor of Clean Water Expected in East Tennessee. &ldquo;We know that process changes to improve the paper mill&rsquo;s discharges are feasible and affordable. The EPA and the mill&rsquo;s own consultants have studied them, and the resistance to implementing them is unjustified.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
&ldquo;By permitting excessive pollution to be discharged into the Pigeon River, North Carolina failed to adequately protect public waters in the best interest of its people,&rdquo; said DJ Gerken, a senior attorney with Southern Environmental Law Center. &ldquo;The citizens of both North Carolina and Tennessee deserve better.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
### <br />
<br />
<strong><span style="font-size: smaller">About Clean Water Expected for East Tennessee</span></strong><span style="font-size: smaller">: Clean Water Expected in East Tennessee is a group of young individuals, primarily raft-guides, who seek to see the Pigeon River live up to it's full potential. <br />
WEB: http://cweet.org/ <br />
<strong>Contact:</strong> Clean Water Expected for East Tennessee, Amelia Taylor, Executive Director, 423-237-5187, amelialetgo@gmail.com <br />
<br />
<strong>About Clean Water for North Carolina:</strong> Clean Water for NC, founded in 1984, is a statewide environmental justice organization working with impacted communities for protection of their environmental rights and health, through organizing, research and advocacy. We have worked with hundreds of community partners on issues including contaminated drinking water wells, toxic air emissions, sewer overflows, damaging mountain developments and toxic industrial discharges. WEB: www.cwfnc.org, FACEBOOK: Clean Water for North Carolina; TWITTER: CleanWaterforNC <br />
<strong>Contact</strong>: Hope Taylor, Executive Director, Clean Water for North Carolina, 919-401-9600, hope@cwfnc.org <br />
<br />
<strong>About Cocke County, Tennessee</strong> <br />
<strong>Contact:</strong> Iliff McMahan, Mayor, Cocke County, Tennessee, 423-237-0928, iliff@cockecounty.net <br />
<br />
<strong>About Sierra Club</strong>: The Sierra Club is a national, grassroots environmental advocacy non-profit organization dedicated to protecting communities, wild places, and the planet itself. The TN Chapter works to explore, enjoy, and protect Tennessee. WEB: http://tennessee.sierraclub.org/ <br />
<strong>Contact:</strong> Axel Ringe, Executive Director, Tennessee Chapter of the Sierra Club, 865-397-1840, <br />
</span><a href="mailto:onyxfarm@bellsouth.net"><span style="font-size: smaller">onyxfarm@bellsouth.net</span></a><span style="font-size: smaller"> <br />
<br />
<strong>About Southern Environmental Law Center </strong><br />
The Southern Environmental Law Center is the only regional nonprofit using the power of the law to protect the health and environment of the Southeast (Virginia, Tennessee, North and South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama). Founded in 1986, SELC's team of 40 legal experts represent more than 100 partner groups on issues of climate change and energy, air and water quality, forests, the coast and wetlands, transportation, and land use. <br />
WEB: www.SouthernEnvironment.org <br />
TWITTER: http://www.twitter.com/selc_org <br />
<br />
<strong>About Tennessee Conservation Voters</strong>: Located in Nashville and founded in 1973, TCV is a coalition of state conservation groups dedicated to raising voter awareness, advocating stronger laws and holding our elected leaders accountable for safeguarding the environment of Tennessee. TCV&rsquo;s executive director Chris Ford hails from 10 generations of Cocke Countians in the Grassy Fork community. WEB: www.tnconservationvoters.org <br />
<strong>Contact:</strong> Chris Ford, Executive Director, Tennessee Conservation Voters, 423-202-1382, 615-269-9090, cford@tnconservationvoters.org <br />
<br />
<strong>About Tennessee Scenic Rivers Association: </strong>The Tennessee Scenic Rivers Association (TSRA) is a volunteer organization dedicated to the preservation, protection and restoration of the scenic, free-flowing rivers of our state. Based in Nashville, Tennessee, the organization has approximately 1,000 members across the state and the south. <br />
WEB: www.paddletsra.org <br />
<strong>Contact:</strong> Daniel Boone, Tennessee Scenic River Association, 615-495-0897, dboone@lithographicsinc.com <br />
<br />
<strong>About Western North Carolina Alliance: </strong>The Western North Carolina Alliance is a grassroots organization which aims to promote a sense of stewardship and caring for the natural environment. The Alliance's primary goal is to protect and to preserve our natural land, water and air resources through education and public participation in policy decisions at all levels of business and government. WEB: www.wnca.org <br />
<strong>Contact:</strong> Hartwell Carson, French Broad Riverkeeper, Western North Carolina Alliance, 828-258-8737, hartwell@wnca.org </span></p>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2010-07-23T15:18:27-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Oil industry assurances not enough</title>
      <link>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/oil_industry_assurances_not_enough/</link>
      <guid>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/oil_industry_assurances_not_enough/#When:14:11:52Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>&ldquo;Relying on assurances from the oil industry about the likelihood and severity of spills and their spill response capabilities is part of what led to the nation&rsquo;s worst environmental disaster in the Gulf of Mexico.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;Oil industry assurances of plans to contain deepwater spills don&rsquo;t carry much weight after three months of oil spewing into the Gulf of Mexico, damaging industries and livelihoods, ways of life, and crucial ecosystems across the Gulf. It&rsquo;ll take much more than oil company plans and assurances to overcome the industry&rsquo;s demonstrated inability to prevent and control a deepwater blowout and spill. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;The Gulf disaster brought to light many regulatory, technological, and oversight problems that must be resolved before deepwater drilling can resume, if it can resume.&rdquo;<br />
&nbsp;<br />
###<br />
<br />
<strong>About Southern Environmental Law Center <br />
</strong><span style="font-size: smaller">The Southern Environmental Law Center is a regional nonprofit using the power of the law to protect the health and environment of the Southeast (Virginia, Tennessee, North and South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama). Founded in 1986, SELC's team of 40 legal experts represent more than 100 partner groups on issues of climate change and energy, air and water quality, forests, the coast and wetlands, transportation, and land use. <br />
WEB: www.SouthernEnvironment.org <br />
TWITTER: http://www.twitter.com/selc_org</span></p>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2010-07-22T14:11:52-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Pause of Risky Deepwater Drilling Needed for Safety</title>
      <link>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/pause_of_risky_deepwater_drilling_needed_for_safety_7_12_10/</link>
      <guid>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/pause_of_risky_deepwater_drilling_needed_for_safety_7_12_10/#When:17:45:59Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The federal moratorium announced today pauses risky deepwater drilling operations until safety and environmental safeguards can be assessed as oil still hemorrhages into the Gulf and onto states&rsquo; coasts after the tragic Deepwater Horizon explosion, according to the Southern Environmental Law Center. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;Halting risky deepwater drilling until we address the current disaster in the Gulf and enact measures to reduce the chance of another massive spill is a sensible step,&rdquo; said Derb Carter, senior attorney and Carolinas director of the Southern Environmental Law Center. &ldquo;Until the oil companies demonstrate the ability to prevent a deepwater blowout and clean up a massive oil spill, the moratorium should stay in place.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
After years of oil and gas companies skirting safety and environmental regulations leading up to the current oil disaster, a temporary pause by the government is necessary to bring oil companies back into compliance with existing regulations and to consider development of new regulations and standards which may be needed to safeguard workers and the environment as well as other industries and wildlife throughout the Gulf Coast. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;The government has ample cause to pause risky deepwater drilling until safety and environmental protection is assured following the tragic explosion, the unstopped oil spill, and resulting damage to fishing and tourism industries, communities, and wildlife along the whole Gulf Coast,&rdquo; said Catherine Wannamaker, a senior attorney at the Southern Environmental Law Center who defended the initial moratorium in federal court on behalf of several environmental groups. &ldquo;To continue deepwater drilling in the Gulf with no adequate plans to prevent and control blowouts, or no ability to clean up massive oil spills would be irresponsible to all who depend on a healthy Gulf Coast now and for future generations.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
In June, Louisiana supported oil industry groups challenging the initial six-month federal moratorium on new deepwater drilling operations which affected less than one percent of the total wells in the Gulf of Mexico. Defenders of Wildlife, Center for Biological Diversity, Earthjustice, Natural Resources Defense Council, Florida Wildlife Federation, Sierra Club, and the Southern Environmental Law Center intervened to support the legal defense of the drilling moratorium. <br />
<br />
According to Environmental Protection Agency estimates, the Gulf Coast tourism industry is worth approximately $20 billion per year and Gulf Coast fish, shellfish, shrimp and oysters have a value of about $1 billion per year. <br />
<br />
### <br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: smaller">About Southern Environmental Law Center <br />
<br />
The Southern Environmental Law Center is a regional nonprofit using the power of the law to protect the health and environment of the Southeast (Virginia, Tennessee, North and South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama). Founded in 1986, SELC&#8217;s team of 40 legal experts represent more than 100 partner groups on issues of climate change and energy, air and water quality, forests, the coast and wetlands, transportation, and land use. <br />
<br />
WEB: www.SouthernEnvironment.org <br />
<br />
TWITTER: http://www.twitter.com/selc_org </span>
</p>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2010-07-12T17:45:59-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Four Environmental Groups Seek To Defend Greenhouse Gas Rule in Court</title>
      <link>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/tailoring_rule_motion_to_intervene/</link>
      <guid>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/tailoring_rule_motion_to_intervene/#When:12:21:27Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Four environmental groups, representing citizens concerned about climate change and forest resources in New England and the Southeast, filed a joint motion in federal court late yesterday to help defend the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's decision to count emissions from burning biomass when it begins regulating global warming pollution from large power plants and other large industrial facilities.&nbsp; The agency's decision also includes a commitment to continue a scientific evaluation of the true carbon impact of the many forms of biomass energy.</p>
<p>Burning woody materials, grasses and other biomass can be a significant component of the effort to achieve climate benefits by shifting America away from fossil fuels-but only if the biomass is sourced and accounted for properly-so that the carbon emitted when biomass is burned equals or is less than the carbon taken up by new plant growth.&nbsp; Recent studies show that combusting some kinds of biomass as fuel can actually increase the amount of climate change pollutants.&nbsp; For example, burning whole trees in mature forests is much less likely to be carbon-neutral than combusting undergrowth and trimmings from plantation stands.</p>
<p>Last month, EPA issued what is commonly called the &quot;tailoring&quot; rule, which establishes the agency's framework for evaluating and limiting carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in Clean Air Act permits for large stationary sources. The agency declined to give all biomass combustion greenhouse gas emissions a blanket exemption from complying with the Act, as was sought by the forest products industry and others.&nbsp; The environmental groups' filing supports EPA's decision to reject the idea that all biomass is inherently &quot;carbon-neutral.&quot;&nbsp; This careful approach avoids making the climate problem worse in the short term and allows for additional study.</p>
<p>The rule is being challenged by industry interests and several members of Congress in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals (<em>Southeastern Legal Foundation, et al. v. US EPA</em>).&nbsp; Late yesterday, Southern Environmental Law Center (SELC) and Clean Air Task Force (CATF) attorneys filed a motion to intervene in defense of this aspect of EPA's rule on behalf of Georgia ForestWatch and Wild Virginia, represented by SELC, and&nbsp; the Conservation Law Foundation and the Natural Resources Council of Maine, represented by CATF.</p>
<p><a href="/uploads/fck/file/Climate%20Change/Tailoring%20Rule_%207_7_10_Motion%20To%20Intervene.pdf">&gt;&gt;Click here for the groups' motion to intervene</a> (pdf)</p>
<p>&quot;The South is already considered the 'fiber basket' of the country, with much of our land producing paper and other forest products. While generating some of our energy from biomass will help the South's rural economies and help shift to cleaner energy, we should look before we leap.&nbsp; In particular, we must ensure a regulatory system that sustains the clean water, the wildlife habitat, the carbon-capturing capacity and the other benefits we get from healthy forests,&quot; said Frank Rambo, Senior Attorney with the SELC, who represents Georgia ForestWatch and Wild Virginia.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&quot;It is obviously of utmost importance that in trying to fix the climate problem, EPA should not take steps that actually make it worse,&quot; said Ann Weeks, Senior Counsel for CATF, and the attorney for Conservation Law Foundation and Natural Resources&nbsp; Council of Maine.&nbsp; &quot;EPA did not bend to pressure from industry to create incentives to burn more biomass for energy generation, which can potentially be more harmful for climate than the fossil fuel it replaces.&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; We have a strong interest making that decision stick, by defending this aspect of the rule, at least until the science on biomass emissions allows a more comprehensive understanding of the various direct and indirect impacts that bioenergy has on climate.&quot;</p>
<p style="text-align: center">#&nbsp;#&nbsp;#</p>
<p><strong><em>The Southern Environmental Law Center </em></strong><em>is a regional nonprofit using the power of the law to protect the health and environment of the Southeast (Virginia, Tennessee, North and South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama). Founded in 1986, SELC's team of 40 legal experts represent more than 100 partner groups on issues of climate change and energy, air and water quality, forests, the coast and wetlands, transportation, and land use.</em> <a href="http://www.SouthernEnvironment.org"><em>www.SouthernEnvironment.org</em></a></p>
<p><strong><em>Clean Air Task Force </em></strong><em>is a nonprofit organization founded in 1996 dedicated to reducing atmospheric pollution through research, advocacy and private sector collaboration. For more information, please visit us at </em><a href="http://www.catf.us"><em>www.catf.us</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2010-07-07T12:21:27-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Gulf Oil Spill Highlights Need to Put Atlantic Coast, Eastern Gulf Off&#45;Limits to Offshore Drilling, Groups Say</title>
      <link>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/gulf_oil_spill_highlights_need_to_put_atlantic_coast_eastern_gulf_off_limit/</link>
      <guid>http://www.southernenvironment.org/newsroom/press_releases/gulf_oil_spill_highlights_need_to_put_atlantic_coast_eastern_gulf_off_limit/#When:11:21:31Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A coalition of&nbsp;31 groups from New Jersey to Florida and Alabama* joined forces today to tell the Obama Administration to permanently withdraw the Mid- and South Atlantic and eastern Gulf from any drilling for offshore oil and gas. (*See below for a complete list. This has been updated as of 1:20 PM to add several new groups.)</p>
<p>Prior to the Deepwater Horizon blowout, the groups had raised concerns about serious harm to the coastal communities, economy and environment in these areas from potential oil and gas drilling as proposed by the Obama Administration on March 31. The ongoing crisis in the Gulf, caused in part by the utter failure of federal oversight of offshore drilling that has now come to light, is a tragic example of the risks involved and the lives and livelihoods at stake with any expanded drilling.</p>
<p>Southern Environmental Law Center, a regional non-profit advocacy organization, submitted formal comments on behalf of the groups to the Department of Interior today detailing the multiple reasons why the agency must permanently withdraw the Mid- and South Atlantic and eastern Gulf from its proposed 5-year (2012-2017) offshore drilling plan. The deadline for public comments is today.</p>
<p><a href="/uploads/fck/file/offshore_drilling/6-30-10_Final%20_SELC_comments_on_2012-2017_leasing_program%202.pdf">See the comments here</a> (pdf).</p>
<p>&quot;Opening these areas to oil and gas drilling would be reckless in the extreme. We are witnessing the dire consequences the oil spill is having in the fragile ecosystems of the central Gulf. A spill would be just as devastating in the Mid- or South Atlantic or the eastern Gulf. In fact, the government ranks the shorelines of these areas as more environmentally sensitive to oil spills than the central Gulf,&quot; said SELC attorney Marirose Pratt.</p>
<p>The Mid- and South Atlantic and eastern Gulf rank just above the central Gulf as the Outer Continental Shelf regions whose coastal habitats are most environmentally sensitive to oil spills due to their extensive coastal lowlands made up of wetlands, marshes, swamps and other sensitive shoreline features, according to recent analyses by the Interior Department cited in the groups' comment letter.</p>
<p>The coastal and marine resources of the Mid- and South Atlantic and eastern Gulf support the region's substantial fishing and tourism economies. In 2008, there were $262.8 million worth of commercial fish landings in Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia, according to NOAA. Tourism provides 30,000 jobs on North Carolina's Outer Banks. In Virginia, the 18 cities and counties of the Chesapeake Bay and coast brought in $4.25 billion in tourism revenue in 2007.</p>
<p>Yet, the three Outer Continental Shelf regions hold just a little over seven months of oil and 15 months of natural gas at current rates of U.S. consumption, according to government estimates.</p>
<p>&quot;The calculation is crystal clear - risking the long-term sustainability of the South's fisheries and coastal economies is not worth the short-term gain in oil and gas. Far from it,&quot; said SELC attorney Deborah Murray. &quot;With families and businesses in the Gulf suffering and more wildlife dying every day, we can not afford to delay immediate action to shift to clean, sustainable energy.&quot;</p>
<p>In their comments, the groups note that federal law requires Minerals Management Service (now the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation, and Enforcment) to consider alternatives as part of the environmental review of its proposed 5-year plan. So far, the only alternatives the agency has identified are simply changing the number or frequency of lease sales, limiting leasing areas, and including coastal buffers. The groups contend MMS must rigorously explore alternatives to oil and gas drilling in the first place, including meeting energy needs through efficiency programs and renewable sources.</p>
<p>Virginia was on track to be the first on the Atlantic with offshore oil and drilling until Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar suspended the leasing process on May 27; however, the lease sale remains in the proposed 5-year plan. Much of the 3 million acre lease area overlaps with areas used by the Navy for training operations based mostly out of the Norfolk Naval Base - the world's largest and an economic mainstay of Hampton Roads. The Department of Defense has consistently opposed oil and gas drilling in Virginia due to concerns of conflicts with its operations; the agency reiterated those concerns earlier this year.</p>
<p>Organizations on the letter:</p>
<p>Alabama Rivers Alliance Altamaha Riverkeeper &amp; Altamaha Coastkeeper (GA)<br />
Center for a Sustainable Coast (GA) <br />
Choctawhatchee Riverkeeper (AL) <br />
Coastal Conservation League (SC) <br />
Conservation Alabama <br />
Conservation Council of North Carolina <br />
Conservation Voters of South Carolina <br />
Defenders of Wildlife<br />
Environment Florida<br />
Environment Georga&nbsp;<br />
Environment New Jersey<br />
Environment North Carolina<br />
Environment Virginia <br />
Georgia Conservancy <br />
Glynn Environmental Coalition (GA) <br />
Hurricane Creekkeeper, Friends of Hurricane Creek (AL) <br />
Mobile Baykeeper<br />
North Carolina Coastal Federation<br />
North Carolina Conservation Network <br />
North Carolina Native Plant Society, Southeast Coast Chapter <br />
Oceana <br />
Ogeechee Riverkeeper (GA) <br />
Pamlico-Tar River Foundation (NC) <br />
PenderWatch &amp; Conservancy (NC) <br />
Savannah Riverkeeper <br />
Sierra Club, North Carolina Chapter <br />
Sierra Club, South Carolina Chapter <br />
Sierra Club, Virginia Chapter <br />
Southern Environmental Law Center <br />
Virginia League of Conservation Voters <br />
&nbsp;</p>
<p>The Southern Environmental Law Center is a regional nonprofit using the power of the law to protect the health and environment of the Southeast (Virginia, Tennessee, North and South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama). Founded in 1986, SELC's team of 40 legal experts represent more than 100 partner groups on issues of climate change and energy, air and water quality, forests, the coast and wetlands, transportation, and land use.</p>
<p><br />
WEB: www.SouthernEnvironment.org <br />
FACEBOOK: http://www.fanofselc.org <br />
TWITTER: http://www.twitter.com/selc_org</p>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2010-06-30T11:21:31-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>