Protecting Atlantic waters from seismic blasting’s “storm of noise” More »
Marine scientist Christopher Clark has been listening to the world’s oceans for more than forty years. Off the coast of Virginia, using simple underwater microphones, the Cornell University bioacoustics expert has heard the rumblings of blue whales across the Atlantic and the calls of North Atlantic right whales swimming through their coastal calving grounds between Cape Canaveral, Florida and Cape Fear, North Carolina.
Increasingly, however, the sounds of marine life are being drowned out by the industrialization of the sea. Heavy shipping traffic floods the Atlantic Ocean with intrusive, ambient sound, and as companies line up for permits to search for oil reserves off the Southeast coast, the powerful air guns used in seismic surveys could soon add even more harmful noise to the underwater din. In fact, says Clark, air gun blasts are “orders of magnitude louder than the loudest ships,” producing a “storm of noise” that would severely disrupt the ocean environment off our shores, threatening marine mammals, critical fisheries, and the habitats of endangered species.
Last January, it appeared the Southeast Atlantic would be spared from the worst sonic harm. Community opposition to offshore oil and gas exploration had convinced the Obama administration to protect the Southeast’s coastal waters from drilling in 2016, and the decision to deny all pending permit applications for seismic testing in the Atlantic followed in early 2017. After all, there is no reason to blast if you don’t plan to drill. But the Trump administration has overturned that decision and pledged to expedite offshore oil and gas exploration, adding yet more danger to the lives of whales and other marine mammals already threatened by climate change, shipping traffic, and the dragnet of industrial fishing gear.
Seismic surveys are harmful, and even deadly, because the “brain-rattling” blasts of air guns profoundly disturb the acoustic environment of the ocean, a world in which many species depend on sound to survive. On a typical survey, a ship towing an array of powerful air guns plows a vast tract of the ocean, firing cannon blasts of compressed air to the seabed every 10 to 12 seconds, 24 hours a day, for weeks or months at a time. The pattern of sound waves reflected back to the ship gives oil and gas prospectors a map of the underwater crust of the Earth, revealing the possible location of fossil fuel reserves.
Studies by the Department of the Interior estimate that the seismic proposals currently under review would cause more than 13 million harmful interactions with marine mammals in the Atlantic, killing or injuring 138,000 whales and dolphins. Among the whales likely to be killed or injured is the critically endangered North Atlantic right whale, of which fewer than 450 remain.
Clark, the bioacoustics expert, has repeatedly highlighted the harmful impacts of seismic blasting. In 2015, he was the lead author of a letter to President Obama, co-signed by 75 marine scientists, “united in [their] concern over the introduction of seismic oil and gas exploration along the U.S. mid-Atlantic and south Atlantic coasts.” Noting that explosive airgun blasts profoundly disturb ocean life, the scientists warned that seismic surveys in Atlantic waters would have “significant, long-lasting, and widespread impacts” on the survival of entire populations of marine species, from tiny plankton to giant humpback whales.
In the acoustic environment of the sea, air gun blasts reverberate across the ocean for thousands of miles. From his listening station sixty miles off the coast of Virginia, Chris Clark can hear seismic blasting from ships just north of Brazil and off the coasts of West Africa and Nova Scotia. In the waters nearby, the noise is so extreme that whales abandon food, family, and habitat to get away from the sonic assault.
Scientists fear that seismic blasting in the Southeast’s coastal waters would have a similar effect on North Atlantic right whales. Driven to near-extinction by 1970 due to a long history of whaling—they get their name for being the “right” whale to kill for a plentiful harvest of oil—they are the most endangered large whales in the ocean today. Their population has hovered between 350 and 500 for decades, but the death of sixteen right whales since mid-April—the most recent discovered just days ago—is unprecedented. Marine scientists place the blame on ship strikes and entanglements in industrial fishing gear, but also point to the rapid warming of the ocean, which is likely disturbing the right whale’s feeding and breeding grounds.
When their senses aren’t being assaulted, right whales communicate freely and “see the ocean through sound,” which orients them to everything they need to survive, and thrive: a big patch of plankton, the call of a potential mate, the way to winter calving grounds, and for newborn whales, the whereabouts of their mothers.
Just now, expecting female North Atlantic right whales are about to swim from their summer feeding grounds, off the coast of Maine and Nova Scotia, to their calving grounds off the coast of the Southeast United States. Because of their role in the future of the population, the success of these animals in making the migration, and returning with their newborn calves, is especially important. Last year’s calving season, which brought only 5 whales into the world, was a scary signal of decline.
“We are in an emergency situation with the North Atlantic right whale, and the idea that we’re going to risk the future of one of the South’s iconic species, while simultaneously putting our coast at risk of oil spills and industrialization is ludicrous,” said Senior Attorney Sierra Weaver. “The need to protect the right whale is yet another reason to protect our coast.”
Defending Our Southern Coasts
Our Southern beaches are world famous destinations and our fisheries are among the most productive in the world. For 30 years, SELC has worked to protect our coastal resources and we remain a leading voice against opening the Southeast and new areas in the eastern Gulf of Mexico to offshore drilling.
Risks of Oil Drilling
In early 2015, the federal government announced it was considering opening up the Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia coasts to offshore oil and gas drilling, a significant shift in federal policy that would jeopardize the communities, jobs, and beloved beaches that are the very heart of our coastal states.
The possibility of drilling off the coast galvanized locals who knew the dangers it posed to the area’s economy and environment. Altogether, more than 100 communities up and down the coast passed resolutions opposing offshore drilling and the harmful seismic testing that precedes it.
In response to the incredible opposition from coastal communities, in 2016 the federal government removed the Atlantic from its offshore leasing plan, protecting all that is special about the Southeast coast.
The beautiful and biologically rich Southeast coastal areas and our Gulf Coast feature some of the most beloved places in the country, including the Chesapeake Bay, the Pamlico Sound, the ACE Basin, and Mobile Bay. Our coasts attract millions of tourists, anglers, and other visitors each year.
Tourism and fishing—both commercial and recreational—are the economic backbone of hundreds of communities along our coasts.
The environmental impacts of offshore drilling and its accompanying infrastructure and refineries onshore were well known even before the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster in the Gulf of Mexico. Ocean rigs routinely spill and leak oil—and sometimes blow out.
Even without a major spill, the industrialization and infrastructure associated with drilling—the rigs, refineries, pipelines, traffic, and routine spills and accidents—would irreparably change our coastal communities and economies.
Even though they are closely related, offshore drilling is regulated separately from seismic testing, a process of using loud airguns to test the ocean floor for fuels. So despite the recent decision to protect the Southeast from offshore drilling, the oil and gas industry continues to push seismic testing and the federal government is currently considering applications for seismic testing in the Atlantic.
Seismic testing is a means to one end: offshore oil and gas development, and it is widely opposed by residents, businesses, and local governments up and down the East Coast. There is absolutely no reason to allow seismic testing, harmful on its own, when the Atlantic coast has overwhelmingly rejected offshore drilling. SELC continues to work alongside coastal communities to ensure seismic testing does not move forward.
Not Worth the Risk
The South has too much to lose and too little to gain by opening up the Southeast coast and eastern Gulf to offshore oil drilling. Instead SELC advocates increased energy efficiency and development of clean, renewable energy sources like offshore wind and solar.
For more information and to get involved, visit ProtectOurCoastNow.com.
This Case Affects
Attorneys on Case
With Governors Stacked Against Offshore Drilling, the Coast Has Spoken
SELC: Trump Administration’s Offshore Drilling Plan Threatens Southeast, Ignores Overwhelming Opposition
Governor Cooper Joins More Than 125 Coastal Communities in Opposing Offshore Drilling
Southern Groups Intervene to Defend Atlantic Coast from Seismic Blasting
Businesses, Former Navy Base Commander: Offshore Drilling a Threat to Economy, Military
Despite Coastal Opposition, Trump Administration Aims to Open Atlantic to Offshore Drilling
Following Overwhelming Opposition from the Atlantic Coast, Seismic Testing Permits Denied
President’s Decision a Victory for Atlantic Coast
Oil & Gas Industry Exaggerates Economic Benefit of Atlantic Offshore Drilling, New Report Finds
SELC Calls on Administration: Heed Lessons from BP Spill, Reverse Plan to Drill in Atlantic
Fact Sheet: Communities Oppose Plan to Open the Southeast Coast to Offshore Drilling
SELC Comments on Offshore Drilling