Forest Service rejects Atlantic Coast Pipeline route

Steep terrain and vital habitat corridors make the George Washington National Forest, pictured here, unsuitable as a pipeline corridor, according to the U.S. Forest Service. (© Robert Llewellyn)

Today, the U.S. Forest Service rejected developers’ preferred path for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline through the George Washington and Monongahela National Forests. The Forest Service letter to the developers said the pipeline is not in line with its forest management plans.

In its letter, the Forest Service noted the number of sensitive resources and endangered species that would be disrupted. The two National Forests in question are considered by many as the best remaining wild land in the region.

The proposed pipeline would deliver natural gas along a 564-mile route from West Virginia to North Carolina. The Allegheny-Blue Ridge Alliance, of which SELC is a founding member, has helped to lead the charge for greater scrutiny of the pipeline proposal since it was first announced in 2014. As the group noted today, Dominion has persistently tried to force its pipeline through these two National Forests while ignoring calls to carefully analyze less destructive alternatives. This rejection of the preferred route by the Forest Service underscores how shallow Dominion’s analysis has been.

“Dominion stubbornly persisted on a route that was identified as severely destructive from the start,” said Senior Attorney Greg Buppert. “It is time for them to step back and truly reconsider the need for this pipeline at all.”

Other agencies also have registered their disproval for the current pipeline path. Recently the West Virginia office of the Fish and Wildlife Service sent a letter urging the developers to identify alternatives to the current path and noting that they have yet to meet their survey obligations.

The agencies’ responses add to the number of comments received by Federal Energy Regulatory Commission that provide scientific and technical evidence of the problems with the current pipeline route. Additionally, SELC and others continue to raise questions about the stated demand driving the project and urge regulators to inventory and evaluate existing pipeline capacity that could be used to meet that demand.

More News

Southern Virginia highway proposal threatens recent progress

This week, SELC filed comments on behalf of itself and 16 organizations on the draft environmental impact statement for the wasteful and destruct...

Nashville mayor signs letter urging Congressional climate action

Nashville Mayor John Cooper is one of nearly 200 U.S. mayors advocating for a zero-carbon green economy that creates jobs and emphasizes equity b...

Thank you for fighting the Atlantic Coast Pipeline with us

When, on July 5th, Duke Energy and Dominion Energy abruptly cancelled the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, it didn't come out of nowhere. For years, SELC...

SELC seeks nominations for 2021 Reed Environmental Writing Award

We are now accepting submissions for the 2021 Phillip D. Reed Environmental Writing Awards. Nominations are welcome from anyone, including reader...

Lawsuit: Government illegally ‘cut corners’ to ram through NEPA changes

SELC is representing a group of 17 environmental organizations in a lawsuit filed today accusing the government of racing through an industry-fri...

Settlement provides relief for Duke Energy customers

The Southern Environmental Law Center recently reached a partial settlement with the North Carolina Sustainable Energy Association and Duke Energ...

More Stories