Forest Service rejects Atlantic Coast Pipeline route

Steep terrain and vital habitat corridors make the George Washington National Forest, pictured here, unsuitable as a pipeline corridor, according to the U.S. Forest Service. (© Robert Llewellyn)

Today, the U.S. Forest Service rejected developers’ preferred path for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline through the George Washington and Monongahela National Forests. The Forest Service letter to the developers said the pipeline is not in line with its forest management plans.

In its letter, the Forest Service noted the number of sensitive resources and endangered species that would be disrupted. The two National Forests in question are considered by many as the best remaining wild land in the region.

The proposed pipeline would deliver natural gas along a 564-mile route from West Virginia to North Carolina. The Allegheny-Blue Ridge Alliance, of which SELC is a founding member, has helped to lead the charge for greater scrutiny of the pipeline proposal since it was first announced in 2014. As the group noted today, Dominion has persistently tried to force its pipeline through these two National Forests while ignoring calls to carefully analyze less destructive alternatives. This rejection of the preferred route by the Forest Service underscores how shallow Dominion’s analysis has been.

“Dominion stubbornly persisted on a route that was identified as severely destructive from the start,” said Senior Attorney Greg Buppert. “It is time for them to step back and truly reconsider the need for this pipeline at all.”

Other agencies also have registered their disproval for the current pipeline path. Recently the West Virginia office of the Fish and Wildlife Service sent a letter urging the developers to identify alternatives to the current path and noting that they have yet to meet their survey obligations.

The agencies’ responses add to the number of comments received by Federal Energy Regulatory Commission that provide scientific and technical evidence of the problems with the current pipeline route. Additionally, SELC and others continue to raise questions about the stated demand driving the project and urge regulators to inventory and evaluate existing pipeline capacity that could be used to meet that demand.

More News

SELC’s pipeline team reflects on the path to victory

“We’re a billion-dollar company and we’re going to put the pipeline wherever we want to put it.” That’s what a Dominion Energy agent told a fath...

SELC opposes plan to destroy 200 acres of S.C. wetlands for development

The state’s environmental agency has granted a pair of certifications for a Charleston-area developer to fill more than 200 acres of wetlands in...

Dominion and Duke Energy abandon Atlantic Coast Pipeline

Updated July 6: When Dominion and Duke Energy announced the Atlantic Coast Pipeline in September 2014, the public knew right from the beginning...

Agreement allows Roxboro residents to breathe cleaner air

People in Roxboro, North Carolina will breathe cleaner air after a highly polluting power plant shuts down by March 2021 thanks to a recently fin...

Reminder of hope for endangered wild red wolves

The birth of seven red wolf pups at the North Carolina Zoo symbolizes hope for the world’s only wild red wolf population, teetering once again on...

Flooding of Blounts Creek with mine wastewater before N.C. Supreme Court

On behalf of Sound Rivers and the North Carolina Coastal Federation, today SELC filed a petition with the North Carolina Supreme Court arguing th...

More Stories