Make your voice count: Forest Service proposing to cut public out of project planning

The Nantahala National Forest is one of many that will be left vulnerable if the U.S. Forest Service enacts a new proposed rule to lessen environmental review and public involvement around forest management decisions. (© Bill Lea)

In June, the U.S. Forest Service proposed sweeping changes that would eliminate environmental review and public involvement for most of its decisions. But your voice matters in how we use our public lands, and we are urging you to make sure the Forest Service knows that by submitting a comment at OurForestsOurVoice.org.

The proposed rule, which would affect decisions made on projects in our forests such as road construction and pipelines, also includes a new loophole for commercial logging that would allow up to 4,200 acres—6.6 square miles—of clearcutting without prior notice or public involvement.

“National forest users—hikers, bikers, scenic drivers, and wildlife watchers—won’t know what’s coming until the logging trucks show up at their favorite trailheads, or until roads and trails are closed,” says Attorney Sam Evans, leader of SELC’s National Forests and Parks Program.

Although logging is one use of our national forest lands, logging in the wrong places and at the wrong times can cause severe harm to other important ecological, social, and economic values.

Those unnecessary harms can be avoided by considering public input, which is required by the nearly 50-year-old National Environmental Policy Act—our nation’s bedrock environmental law that ensures thorough public disclosure of federal decision-making, and allows the public to provide input on decisions that impact our environment.

The proposed changes will be felt especially hard in the ecologically diverse and extremely popular national forests of the southern and central Appalachians.  New logging loopholes could allow the Forest Service to implement virtually its entire commercial logging program with no transparency or accountability. 

 “Balancing America’s many needs and uses on our public lands is hard work, but it is the Forest Service's most important job.  And to protect what matters to the public, the agency has to start by listening to the public,” says Evans. “The new proposal makes it clear that the agency is turning its back on that responsibility.” 

Please submit a comment to protect NEPA, and to tell the Forest Service your voice matters.

More News

Reminder of hope for endangered wild red wolves

The birth of seven red wolf pups at the North Carolina Zoo symbolizes hope for the world’s only wild red wolf population, teetering once again on...

Flooding of Blounts Creek with Martin Marietta’s mine wastewater before N.C. Supreme Court

On behalf of Sound Rivers and the North Carolina Coastal Federation, today SELC filed a petition with the North Carolina Supreme Court arguing th...

SELC updates hurricane report after two record-breaking storm seasons

The past two hurricane seasons have flung monster storms towards the East Coast and through areas that President Trump wants to open to offshore...

New podcast season navigates sea level rise in the South

On the latest season of Broken Ground, which launched this week, podcast host Claudine Ebeid McElwain takes listeners to two Southern coastal cit...

Regional impact: Critical permit for pipelines vacated

A decision reached in federal court late last month could have significant implications for the fate of the $8 billion Atlantic Coast Pipeline....

Southeastern groups join states and regulators in defending solar net metering programs

Last week, over 50,000 individuals and 600 organizations, states, regulators, and elected officials submitted comments and petitions defending th...

More Stories