N.C. General Assembly attempts to subvert local control of fracking

Above is the North Carolina state legislative building where, as its session drew to a close last week, state Senators snuck in a bill denying local municipalities the right to regulate drilling using hydraulic fracturing, or fracking. (© iStock)

In the final hour of the 2015 legislative session, around 4:00 a.m., the North Carolina State Senate slipped a provision into Senate Bill 119 that attempts to prohibit local governments from regulating fracking in any manner. This language was not in any prior bill this legislative session, and received no committee hearing or vetting of any kind by the public or by the affected local governments.

“This is yet another example of the state attempting to lure the fracking industry to North Carolina over the objection of those who would be most directly impacted,” Attorney Brooks Rainey Pearson said.

The language in S119, which the governor has signed, is much broader and more stringent than the prior fracking pre-emption provision. While Senators didn’t name any targets of the provision, Lee County, in the heart of North Carolina’s shale gas resource, was poised to pass a moratorium on oil and gas extraction next week. County officials told the AP they plan to continue pursuing the moratorium. Several North Carolina counties could also be affected. Anson, Chatham and Stokes counties each recently passed a moratorium on fracking while Wake County, like Lee County, was planning to pass a moratorium this week.

Fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, is a method of extracting natural gas by drilling horizontally into underground shale formations and injecting a high pressure mixture of water and chemicals into the ground. Issues with the process include the concern that the chemicals used can migrate into groundwater, the massive amounts of freshwater used in the process, and the industrial infrastructure that accompanies the drilling. With this bill, the state’s General Assembly attempted to take away the ability of local elected officials to protect their residents from the impacts of this industry through common sense measures such as setbacks and noise and light restrictions. SELC is considering the options available to local governments given this new development.


Read further coverage of S119 in the Fayetteville Observer.

More News

Southern Virginia highway proposal threatens recent progress

This week, SELC filed comments on behalf of itself and 16 organizations on the draft environmental impact statement for the wasteful and destruct...

Nashville mayor signs letter urging Congressional climate action

Nashville Mayor John Cooper is one of nearly 200 U.S. mayors advocating for a zero-carbon green economy that creates jobs and emphasizes equity b...

Thank you for fighting the Atlantic Coast Pipeline with us

When, on July 5th, Duke Energy and Dominion Energy abruptly cancelled the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, it didn't come out of nowhere. For years, SELC...

SELC seeks nominations for 2021 Reed Environmental Writing Award

We are now accepting submissions for the 2021 Phillip D. Reed Environmental Writing Awards. Nominations are welcome from anyone, including reader...

Lawsuit: Government illegally ‘cut corners’ to ram through NEPA changes

SELC is representing a group of 17 environmental organizations in a lawsuit filed today accusing the government of racing through an industry-fri...

Settlement provides relief for Duke Energy customers

The Southern Environmental Law Center recently reached a partial settlement with the North Carolina Sustainable Energy Association and Duke Energ...

More Stories