SELC and partners blast Forest Service proposal to gut NEPA

Proposal would eliminate review, public input for most national forest projects

Public input and environmental review is paramount for the management of our public lands.

The U.S. Forest Service proposed sweeping policy changes in June that would eliminate environmental review and public involvement for most of its decisions, prompting SELC and partner groups to submit formal opposition this week.

In comments to the agency, 177 groups said the proposed changes to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) would gut the nation’s bedrock environmental law by, among other things, allowing the Forest Service to approve large-scale projects of up to 7,300 acres, including up to 6.6 square miles of commercial logging  on national forest land at one time without any notice or public input.

“Public involvement has saved countless acres of old growth forests, rare habitats, streams, trails, and scenic vistas by persuading the Forest Service to relocate or scale back logging projects, roads, and other infrastructure,” says Sam Evans, leader of SELC’s National Forests and Parks Program. “Now, under tremendous pressure to meet climbing timber quotas, the agency wants to forgo those improvements and instead hide the impacts of its projects from public view. We won’t stand for it.”

Under the Forest Service’s proposed rule, the public would lose the right to comment on more than 93 percent of decisions affecting national forests and grasslands. Although the agency has stated that changes are needed to speed up project delivery, our comments point out that  the Forest Service’s own data prove that projects developed using public input and transparent scientific analysis are actually more efficient on a per-acre basis than projects developed behind closed doors.

The sweeping draft rule creates new and expanded loopholes called “categorical exclusions” to exempt an alarming range of projects from public review, including logging, roadbuilding, oil and gas drilling, mining, and power lines. Currently, categorical exclusions are reserved for routine projects that don’t harm the environment, such as hiking trail restoration or maintenance on park buildings.

“This rule would streamline the destruction of America’s national forests,” says Alison Flint, Director of Litigation and Agency Policy at The Wilderness Society. “Under the guise of ‘modernizing’ forest policy, the rule would shut out the public while speeding up logging, road building and other assaults on wild lands that the public owns.”

While the Forest Service’s proposal would impact forests across the country, its effects may be most severe in the national forests of the Southeastern U.S., where western-scale timber projects are wildly inappropriate.

Before finalizing its proposal, the Forest Service must consider the objections raised in these and the tens of thousands of other comments submitted in opposition.

More News

Georgians: Tell the Public Service Commission to reject Georgia Power’s proposed fee hike

Georgia Power is looking to charge customers more for electricity, including making it harder for customers to save money by consuming less. The...

Multi-front attack on clean water takes aim at state authority

In another affront to clean water protections, the Trump administration is proposing to weaken the key mechanism states use to ensure federally a...

Iconic southern bird at risk of losing key federal protections

The iconic red-cockaded woodpecker has been considered endangered for nearly fifty years. Now, the federal agency tasked with protecting the spec...

Agency hides red wolf info while leaving species to dwindle

Today SELC filed suit against the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for its ongoing lack of transparency regarding management of the world’s last re...

Fall News, 2019

Our print newsletter has hit mailboxes every season for more than three decades. Now, to make it easily accessible for all, we're also presenting...

U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear case on unnecessary and destructive Atlantic Coast Pipeline

Today, the nation’s highest court agreed to review a lower court decision, which revoked a U.S. Forest Service permit for the unnecessary and des...

More Stories