SELC and partners criticize USDA support for biomass energy

USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack voices support for biomass energy, which has led to harmful deforestation throughout the Southeast. (© SELC)

In a recent letter addressed to U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Tom Vilsack, SELC and seven partner organizations challenged Secretary Vilsack’s support of biomass energy, which entails burning wood pellets for utility-scale electricity reduction. Recent increases in biomass facilities have led to harmful deforestation throughout the Southeast, yet Vilsack voiced support for the practice in a letter penned this spring to the United Kingdom’s Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change.

In response to Vilsack’s letter, SELC and its partners offer compelling counter-arguments to his “factually inaccurate” claims that “misrepresent scientific studies” and overstate the benefits of biomass energy.

Vilsack and industry representatives assert there is a reduction in carbon emissions when shifting from fossil fuels to biomass. SELC and partners have found “wood-burning power plants emit more carbon pollution at the smokestack than fossil-fueled plants for each unit of energy generated. Even accounting for forest regrowth, the net additional carbon pollution from bioenergy persists in the atmosphere for years to decades.”

 As U.S. wood pellet exports are expected to increase in the years to come having nearly doubled between 2013 and 2015, SELC and partner organizations continue to champion proper carbon accounting and safeguards for our invaluable wetland forest ecosystems.

SELC joined the Center for Biological Diversity, Clean Air Task Force, Dogwood Alliance, Natural Resources Defense Council, Partnership for Policy Integrity, Pivot Point, and Sierra Club in signing the letter.

Learn more about SELC’s bioenergy efforts in the South.

Vilsack’s letter incorrectly contends that burning wood pellets sourced from forests in the southern United States “provides significant greenhouse gas benefits to the U.K. due to reduced fossil fuel combustion,” and “delivers compelling carbon and societal benefits to the United States.” 

More News

Appeals court affirms Smithfield’s liability for noxious odors, noise, and pests

The U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals found Murphy-Brown/Smithfield Foods, the world’s largest pork producers, liable for noxious odors, noise...

8 ways we’re thwarting Trump’s anti-environmental agenda

SELC has emerged as an effective and trusted national leader in fighting against the Trump administration’s long list of anti-environmental assau...

South DeKalb residents challenge Metro Green Recycling facility

Residents of the City of Stonecrest and DeKalb County have moved to intervene in an ongoing suit against Metro Green Recycling’s construction and...

U.S. Forest Service finalizes rule to cut science and public input; increase logging on national forests

The U.S. Forest Service announced today that it is set to finalize a rule that will cut science-based analysis, transparency, and public input fr...

Conservation groups sue USFWS to save wild red wolves

Updated 11/23 at 9am: SELC filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction in the new red wolf case, asking for more specific emergency relief to save...

N.C. adds methyl bromide to list of toxic air pollutants as result of public pressure

After years of public pressure, stakeholder engagement, and an exhaustive rulemaking process, North Carolina has joined approximately 20 other st...

More Stories