SELC pushes back against TVA effort to expand closed-door decision-making

SELC, Sierra Club, and more than a dozen conservation groups submitted comments yesterday on proposed alterations to Tennessee Valley Authority’s procedures under the National Environmental Policy Act, or NEPA. The federal utility wants to dramatically modify the way it considers environmental impacts when making decisions about providing public power and managing public lands. These changes limit the public’s involvement and allow more closed-door decisions around issues that affect clean water, public lands, electricity rates, and citizens’ private property. Changes to TVA’s NEPA procedures would put 239,000 acres of public land and 11,000 miles of shoreline throughout the agency’s seven-state territory at risk of detrimental environmental effects and raise public health concerns for 9 million residents of the Tennessee Valley.

Examples of past TVA actions taken without public input under NEPA include:

  • Drilling into drinking water supplies without considering nearby toxic-laden groundwater, putting public’s safety at risk;
  • Extensive tree removal on public and private property without investigating potential impacts on water quality, endangered species, or wildlife;
  • Purchasing a fossil fuel-fired power plant;
  • Charging ratepayers more money for using less electricity.

Rather than improving the transparency one would expect from a government organization, TVA’s proposal threatens to give the utility free reign to make these types of decisions behind closed doors in the future.

The purpose of NEPA is to ensure that a federal agency like TVA makes informed decisions by requiring the agency to consider the potential effects of its activities on the natural world. The act also ensures that agencies seek input from communities on its activities and their impacts.

TVA’s proposal also would exclude 50 broad categories of activities from NEPA review. These exclusions would allow the utility to undertake nearly all of its activities without considering the environmental effects of its actions or notifying or involving the people who may be directly affected by the agency’s plans.

More News

Transportation, climate & equity: Building a just transition to a clean transportation future

In late November, leaders from government, nonprofits, and local communities joined together for a day-long discussion about the connection betwe...

Virginia governor proposes $733 million in new funds for environment

Today, Virginia Governor Ralph Northam proposed a budget that includes $733 million in new funding for the environment, clean energy, and environ...

“No action” at Superfund site not acceptable

A community in eastern North Carolina is taking action after news that a Superfund site in their neighborhood will be left as-is. “It is imperat...

Proposed federal energy rollbacks threaten renewable energy growth

This week, SELC filed comments on behalf of eighteen organizations across the Southeast opposing proposed rollbacks to clean energy policies at t...

TVA to terminate its popular payback program for going solar

You know the deal. When a household with rooftop solar panels produces more energy than it can use, it sends the excess back to the grid, and man...

N.C. Governor urges federal action for wild wolves

As federal officials abandon their obligations to wild red wolves, North Carolina’s governor weighed in this week with a letter to key officials...

More Stories