U.K.’s abandonment of coal could threaten Southern forests

A clearcut wetland at an Enviva site in North Carolina. (© Dogwood Alliance)

While President Trump is doubling down on coal as an energy source, British Prime Minister Theresa May vowed this week to give up the dirty fossil fuel by 2025.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau joined May for the announcement and the commitment to end their countries’ reliance on a fuel that has filled the atmosphere with heat-trapping greenhouse gases.

The news was greeted globally as an affirmation that world industrial powers are able to chart a course to cleaner power sources.

However, one area viewed the announcement with trepidation:

The South.

For the last decade, states including Virginia, North Carolina, and Georgia have hosted factories that turned wood into fuel pellets and shipped them to the United Kingdom. There, power plants that burned coal now burn wood pellets that once stood as Southern forests.

But that process has proven fraught with two significant downsides. Studies now show burning wood pellets produces more – not less – heat-trapping carbon dioxide. And to meet the U.K.’s escalating demand for wood pellets, U.S. suppliers have had to rely on harvesting whole trees instead of using only waste wood.

That, says SELC’s David Carr, is a direct threat to Southern forests.

“If the United Kingdom fills the coal gap with wood pellets, that will further boost a market that is already clear-cutting timber to meet demand,” he said. “Worse, we’ll lose acres upon acres of valuable forests to export a fuel that loads the atmosphere with even more carbon dioxide. That’s a losing proposition all around.”

Wood pellets, often called “biomass,” were traditionally created from sawdust and sawmill residue. But as the U.K. demand for wood pellets grew, U.S. companies began chopping entire trees to keep up.

Carr said, to meet present demand, the wood-pellet company Enviva in eastern North Carolina and southeastern Virginia will need to cut about 100 square miles of forest each year.

More demand would mean more clear-cutting, he said.

“Eliminating coal from power production will improve the planet’s atmosphere and combat global warming,” Carr said. “But the replacement must be clean, renewable energy like wind and solar. We can’t just ditch one pollution source for another that’s easily just as bad. And those who value their Southern forests surely don’t want them scalped and packaged for export.”

Related: North Carolina’s environmental agency neglects to hold public hearing for polluting pellet plant, via Southeast Energy News

More News

Appeals court affirms Smithfield’s liability for noxious odors, noise, and pests

The U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals found Murphy-Brown/Smithfield Foods, the world’s largest pork producers, liable for noxious odors, noise...

8 ways we’re thwarting Trump’s anti-environmental agenda

SELC has emerged as an effective and trusted national leader in fighting against the Trump administration’s long list of anti-environmental assau...

South DeKalb residents challenge Metro Green Recycling facility

Residents of the City of Stonecrest and DeKalb County have moved to intervene in an ongoing suit against Metro Green Recycling’s construction and...

U.S. Forest Service finalizes rule to cut science and public input; increase logging on national forests

The U.S. Forest Service announced today that it is set to finalize a rule that will cut science-based analysis, transparency, and public input fr...

Conservation groups sue USFWS to save wild red wolves

Updated 11/23 at 9am: SELC filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction in the new red wolf case, asking for more specific emergency relief to save...

N.C. adds methyl bromide to list of toxic air pollutants as result of public pressure

After years of public pressure, stakeholder engagement, and an exhaustive rulemaking process, North Carolina has joined approximately 20 other st...

More Stories