Court victory: Wild red wolves get another chance at survival

Today a court in North Carolina ruled that federal officials violated legal requirements to protect and recover the world’s last wild red wolves. The ruling came in our challenge to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s actions authorizing the capturing and killing of non-problem wolves and abandoning conservation measures that had been used for decades.

Following an October hearing, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina issued an order declaring the Fish and Wildlife Service violated the Endangered Species Act and the National Environmental Policy Act in its management changes.

Examining the agency’s decisions to simultaneously allow private landowners to shoot and kill non-problem red wolves, to end releases of red wolves, and to end active management of coyotes, the court found that “taken together, these actions go beyond the agency’s discretion and operate to violate [the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s] mandate to recover this species in the wild.”

The court also made permanent its 2016 order stopping the Fish and Wildlife Service from capturing and killing, and authorizing private landowners to capture and kill wild red wolves.

For four years now, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has been dismantling one of the most successful predator reintroductions in U.S. history,” said Senior Attorney Sierra Weaver. “The service knows how to protect and recover the red wolf in the wild, but it stopped listening to its scientists and started listening to bureaucrats instead. The law doesn’t allow the agency to just walk away from species conservation, like it did here.”

SELC brought the federal court action on behalf of Defenders of Wildlife, the Animal Welfare Institute and the Red Wolf Coalition over the Fish and Wildlife Service’s decision to allow red wolves that were not causing any problems to be shot and killed by private landowners. This occurred at the same time as the agency rolled back conservation measures that had helped red wolves grow from four pairs released in 1987, to over 100 animals in eastern North Carolina from 2002-2014. Since those management changes were made, the red wolf population has plummeted over the past four years to as few as 24 known red wolves in the wild today.

The Fish and Wildlife Service attempted to avoid a ruling in this lawsuit by proposing a new rule in June to restrict wild red wolves to one National Wildlife Refuge and a bombing range in eastern North Carolina. The proposed rule would allow the immediate killing of any wolves that live on or wander onto non-federal lands in what previously had been a designated 1.7 million acre five-county Red Wolf Recovery Area.

The proposal would reduce the recovery area by almost 90 percent, eliminating protections for endangered red wolves from 1.5 million acres. In 2016, a group of 30 scientists condemned such a scenario because the limited area could not support a viable population of red wolves and was inconsistent with the best available science. Conservation groups opposed this proposal, arguing instead for an alternative that would reinstate previous successful management measures.

According to the conservation groups, 99.9 percent of the 108,124 comments that the agency received on its proposed rule supported red wolf recovery in the wild. Only 19 comments—with 13 of these coming from a single real estate developer—supported USFWS’s proposal to restrict red wolves to only federal lands in Dare County.

The red wolf recovery program served as a model for reintroduction efforts and was widely celebrated as a success for 25 years before the service began ending its successful conservation actions. Once common throughout the Southeast, intensive predator control programs and loss of habitat drove the red wolf to extinction in the wild in the late 1970s. Later, red wolves bred in captivity were reintroduced on a North Carolina peninsula within their native range in the late 1980s.


Read more about the ruling from

The Washington Post

The News Observer

The Post & Courier

More News

Georgia Power confirms coal ash ponds fail to meet federal restrictions

At least ten of Georgia Power’s toxic, unlined coal ash ponds sit dangerously close to the groundwater beneath them, according to the utility’s r...

Tennessee Wilderness Act will protect 20,000 acres of Cherokee National Forest

There was a present for Tennessee in the Farm Bill that recently passed Congress: The Tennessee Wilderness Act was included in the omnibus legisl...

Federal court throws out pipeline’s Forest Service approval

Today the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a federal approval for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline to cross two national forests and part of th...

Looking ahead to major energy decisions in 2019, Georgians demand Fair Energy Now

High power bills burden many Georgia families, but few know why that is or what they can do about it. To change that, SELC, Georgia Interfaith P...

Op-ed: Why we support the Chemours consent order

Senior Attorney Geoff Gisler and Cape Fear Riverkeeper Kemp Burdette laid out their case for settlement over GenX contamination in a piece publis...

SELC sues to stop seismic blasting in the Atlantic

Southern Environmental Law Center attorneys today joined a coalition of conservation groups in filing a lawsuit to stop the Trump administration...

More Stories