Duke Energy proposes increasing carcinogens downstream in permit renewal

Bromides can react with chlorine in water treatment systems to produce carcinogens. (© Amy Benoit)

As part of its 2015 criminal plea agreement, Duke Energy admitted that bromide discharged into rivers and lakes from its coal ash operations have caused carcinogens to form in downstream drinking water systems. Some of these carcinogens are so dangerous that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has set their health protection goal at zero, meaning that people should not be exposed to any level of these pollutants.

In its filing, Duke Energy identified dozens of downstream drinking water systems that serve millions of people in North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia that may be impacted by the company’s bromide discharges.

Yet instead of taking responsible action to halt these bromide discharges, Duke Energy is proposing to add even more bromides to its coal ash basins, through changes to its coal plant operations. Duke Energy claims that the additional bromides will reduce emissions of mercury from its smokestacks. The utility is choosing this bromide production despite the fact that other modern, widely-used technologies—such as baghouses—are available to control mercury emissions without causing carcinogens downstream. Baghouses are commonly used and collect particulate matter generated by industrial production.

This proposed additional bromide contamination is bad for families that count on clean drinking water; bad for businesses that require high-quality water; and bad for people living near Duke Energy’s coal ash ponds who would be forced to choose between contaminated well water and bromide-contaminated municipal water.

In comments submitted recently to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, SELC urged the agency to require Duke Energy to excavate its coal ash basins that are leaking bromide into North Carolina’s rivers. The agency must also put limits on bromide that ensure protection of downstream water users, and it must require Duke Energy to use real pollution controls for mercury emissions, instead of turning a mercury pollution problem into a cancer-causing bromide problem. 

More News

Settlement agreement reached to address ABC Coke pollution

In a long-sought win for northeast Birmingham and Tarrant neighborhoods, SELC and GASP have made significant improvements to a consent decree tha...

Rejoining the Paris Climate Agreement

SELC released the following statement by Executive Director Jeff Gleason in response to President Biden’s Executive Order to rejoin the Paris Cli...

Solutions to climate change and environmental problems start in the South

When it comes to finding solutions to protect the people and environment of the South, the Southern Environmental Law Center is leading the way....

Groups urge Memphis water utility to protect wellfield and aquifer from oil pipeline threat

SELC and a coalition of citizen and conservation groups sent a letter to Memphis Light, Gas and Water (MLGW) requesting that the utility take act...

Ala. Public Service Commission’s approval of $1B+ gas expansion challenged

SELC—along with Energy Alabama and GASP—are appealing the Public Service Commission’s approval of Alabama Power’s petition for its single largest...

Trump rule reverses decades of migratory bird protections

Days after the New Year and barely a week after the close of a public review period, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service put out a final rule to r...

More Stories