Public comments cause Interior to rethink National Park fee hike

Shenandoah National Park (© Robert Llewellyn)

A proposal by the Trump administration to drastically increase visitor fees at national parks is being reconsidered after the Interior Department received more than 100,000 comments on the proposal, nearly all of them in opposition.

In February, SELC joined with more than two dozen organizations — including environmental, community, religious and historic preservation organizations, recreation and fishing groups, and local businesses — to send a letter to the U.S. Department of the Interior formally opposing the fee hike and offering more reasonable alternatives to deal with a mounting maintenance backlog at the parks.

On April 2, The Washington Post reported that the Interior Department was backing away from the plan, which would have raised entrance fees at 17 parks, including Virginia’s Shenandoah National Park, from $25 to $70 during peak season. An Interior Department spokesperson confirmed that the plan is being reconsidered, and more modest fee increases are being discussed.

The letter voiced concerns that a drastic fee increase would place a park visit out of reach for many Americans and cut the number of visitors, especially for an eastern park like Shenandoah that attracts many day-trip visitors. This sharp fee increase also would restrict park access for nearby residents and negatively affect local economies, which benefit from the parks’ tourism and outdoor recreation visitors.

Visitors to Shenandoah National Park spend $90 million every year in nearby communities.

The administration had claimed the fee hike would help to address an $11.3 billion maintenance backlog facing the National Park System, but there are much better alternatives for meeting those needs. Shenandoah National Park’s deferred maintenance totals $76 million.

In addition to SELC, the letter was signed by representatives from Virginia Conservation Network, the Albemarle Angler, The Clinch Coalition, Friends of the Rappahannock, Hampden-Sydney College Fly Fishing Club, James River Association, New Virginia Majority, Piedmont Environmental Council, Potomac Appalachian Trail Club Southern Shenandoah Valley Chapter, Potomac River Smallmouth Club, Rappahannock League for Environmental Protection, Rockbridge Area Conservation Council, Shenandoah National Park Trust, Shenandoah Riverkeeper, Shenandoah Valley Battlefields Foundation, Shenandoah Valley Network, South River Fly Shop, Trinity Presbyterian Earth Care House Church, Virginia Bicycling Federation, Virginia Chapter of the Sierra Club, Valley Conservation Council, Virginia Outside, Virginia Wilderness Committee, Wild Virginia, and The Wilderness Society.

More News

Transportation, climate & equity: Building a just transition to a clean transportation future

In late November, leaders from government, nonprofits, and local communities joined together for a day-long discussion about the connection betwe...

Virginia governor proposes $733 million in new funds for environment

Today, Virginia Governor Ralph Northam proposed a budget that includes $733 million in new funding for the environment, clean energy, and environ...

“No action” at Superfund site not acceptable

A community in eastern North Carolina is taking action after news that a Superfund site in their neighborhood will be left as-is. “It is imperat...

Proposed federal energy rollbacks threaten renewable energy growth

This week, SELC filed comments on behalf of eighteen organizations across the Southeast opposing proposed rollbacks to clean energy policies at t...

TVA to terminate its popular payback program for going solar

You know the deal. When a household with rooftop solar panels produces more energy than it can use, it sends the excess back to the grid, and man...

N.C. Governor urges federal action for wild wolves

As federal officials abandon their obligations to wild red wolves, North Carolina’s governor weighed in this week with a letter to key officials...

More Stories