Trump address offers little direction on infrastructure again

The LYNX Blue Line runs 18.9 miles through downtown Charlotte, North Carolina.

In his State of the Union address last night, President Donald Trump spoke often of the need for unity and bipartisanship. One area that has long seemed ripe for actual bipartisan cooperation is infrastructure. Unfortunately, Trump barely mentioned that in his speech — and what little he said was woefully short on details.

There is widespread agreement that the nation has tremendous and pressing infrastructure needs. We need to repair and improve critical infrastructure like bridges, roads, rail, transit, broadband and water and sewer systems.

In the past, Trump has made grand promises about infrastructure, pitching more than a trillion dollars in spending. His actual proposal fell far short. Focusing on public-private partnerships and shifting much of the financial burden to states, he previously proposed relatively little additional federal spending. In his speech last night, Trump offered no specific funding proposals whatsoever.

Trump’s proposals are not just monetarily inadequate. America needs to make substantial investments in infrastructure, but those investments need to be well thought out and targeted toward improvements that strengthen all communities, protect public health, build resiliency, cut pollution, and help address the climate crisis.

For example, we should invest in cleaner transportation infrastructure like mass transit and rail rather than add more highway lanes that will soon become congested. And we should use taxpayer dollars more efficiently by adopting a “fix it first” approach that focuses on bringing existing infrastructure to a state of good repair.

Trump’s earlier infrastructure proposal treated environmental protection measures and public-input requirements as hindrances to rebuilding infrastructure. In fact, public input and consideration of the impacts of construction, as well as the investigation of alternative approaches, helps ensure the best use of taxpayers’ dollars. Any infrastructure package should strengthen, rather than weaken, environmental protection and community input.

The lack of specifics in the State of the Union address puts the ball squarely in Congress’ court. SELC will be weighing in and closely monitoring legislative hearings and discussions to promote a meaningful infrastructure package that also cuts pollution and increases climate resilience.

More News

Public comments lead to modifications in agreement stopping Chemours’ GenX pollution

Today North Carolina officials filed an updated agreement that requires the Chemours Company, LLC to stop polluting the Cape Fear River with toxi...

Motion filed to halt seismic blasting

A group of conservation organizations including SELC today asked a federal judge to block the start of harmful seismic airgun blasting in the Atl...

Camden County, Ga. sued over documents withheld about Spaceport risks

As proponents of Spaceport Camden continue to push the controversial project forward despite mounting questions concerning public safety and envi...

Duke University is last piece in regional light rail puzzle

Duke University is the lone holdout at a critical juncture for the long-planned and widely supported Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project. Go...

Coal ash cleanup victory in Virginia

Today, Virginia legislators from both sides of the aisle came together amid a remarkably tumultuous political backdrop, to pass a law that will o...

Take action to protect clean water

A few weeks ago the Environmental Protection Agency announced an unprecedented, risky proposal to gut clean water protections that have been in p...

More Stories