Trump address offers little direction on infrastructure again

The LYNX Blue Line runs 18.9 miles through downtown Charlotte, North Carolina.

In his State of the Union address last night, President Donald Trump spoke often of the need for unity and bipartisanship. One area that has long seemed ripe for actual bipartisan cooperation is infrastructure. Unfortunately, Trump barely mentioned that in his speech — and what little he said was woefully short on details.

There is widespread agreement that the nation has tremendous and pressing infrastructure needs. We need to repair and improve critical infrastructure like bridges, roads, rail, transit, broadband and water and sewer systems.

In the past, Trump has made grand promises about infrastructure, pitching more than a trillion dollars in spending. His actual proposal fell far short. Focusing on public-private partnerships and shifting much of the financial burden to states, he previously proposed relatively little additional federal spending. In his speech last night, Trump offered no specific funding proposals whatsoever.

Trump’s proposals are not just monetarily inadequate. America needs to make substantial investments in infrastructure, but those investments need to be well thought out and targeted toward improvements that strengthen all communities, protect public health, build resiliency, cut pollution, and help address the climate crisis.

For example, we should invest in cleaner transportation infrastructure like mass transit and rail rather than add more highway lanes that will soon become congested. And we should use taxpayer dollars more efficiently by adopting a “fix it first” approach that focuses on bringing existing infrastructure to a state of good repair.

Trump’s earlier infrastructure proposal treated environmental protection measures and public-input requirements as hindrances to rebuilding infrastructure. In fact, public input and consideration of the impacts of construction, as well as the investigation of alternative approaches, helps ensure the best use of taxpayers’ dollars. Any infrastructure package should strengthen, rather than weaken, environmental protection and community input.

The lack of specifics in the State of the Union address puts the ball squarely in Congress’ court. SELC will be weighing in and closely monitoring legislative hearings and discussions to promote a meaningful infrastructure package that also cuts pollution and increases climate resilience.

More News

Standing in solidarity

A statement from the Southern Environmental Law Center Executive Director Jeff Gleason: The horrific murders of George Floyd, and of Breonna Tay...

Years of fierce fighting end with floodplain preserved

With the recent $3 million sale of 547 acres of floodplain property, a 20-year saga over a billion-dollar South Carolina development came to a lo...

Decision to log forest ignores public input and science, threatens trout streams

In a decision announced May 22, the U.S. Forest Service committed to charging ahead with irresponsible plans to log in the headwaters of the Nant...

SELC op-ed: N.C. DOT should look beyond road building to projects that build stronger communities

As the North Carolina Department of Transportation faces multiple challenges made worse by the global health crisis at hand, now is our chance to...

Mega-landfill proposal threatens rural community, historic school

The proposed construction of a massive landfill in rural Cumberland County, Virginia, led SELC lawyers and the University of Virginia Law School’...

Watch Readings from 2020 Reed Writing Award Winners

This year’s winners of the Reed Environmental Writing Award are author Margaret Renkl and journalist Megan Mayhew Bergman. Renkl was recognized f...

More Stories