The red-cockaded woodpecker is an endangered Southern icon
Why is the red-cockaded woodpecker at risk?
Once common in the South, red-cockaded woodpeckers now number as few as 7,800 active clusters of birds. Logging and fire suppression destroyed much of the longleaf pine habitat where the woodpecker makes its home. As the number of older pines and the size of forests decreased, so did the red-cockaded woodpecker population. The bird has rebounded slightly under decades of intensive management and the protections of the Endangered Species Act, but it’s still found only in isolated pockets of the South. Now climate change is increasing the intensity and frequency of the severe storms and rising temperatures that destroy what habitat the red-cockaded woodpecker has left.
Federal protections are critical to the red-cockaded woodpecker’s survival
In the face of these threats, the federal agency charged with protecting the red-cockaded woodpecker isn’t proposing to maintain or enhance protections for the bird — it’s proposing to remove them. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has proposed to reclassify the red-cockaded woodpecker as a “threatened” species instead of an “endangered” one, even though it hasn’t met its own criteria for such a downlisting. Instead, USFWS’s own assessment shows that the majority of the woodpecker’s isolated populations are small, with “inherently very low or low resiliency” to withstand environmental threats.
Yet USFWS is considering removing protections for this rare bird, anyway. Thanks to the Trump administration’s rollbacks to Endangered Species Act regulations, reclassifying the red-cockaded woodpecker means it would lose protections against harm, and that its pine forest habitat would be exposed to greater threats, too. The move to reclassify it isn’t supported by science and would have catastrophic implications for the red-cockaded woodpecker’s survival.
The Fish & Wildlife Service appears to want to claim another ‘recovered’ species, but claiming recovery and achieving it are two very different things.Ramona McGee, SELC Staff Attorney
SELC is working to save the red-cockaded woodpecker
Federal agencies like the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service have been abandoning science-based decision making in recent years, but SELC is fighting every step of the way. Using public records, for example, SELC unearthed an internal USFWS Southeast Region policy to “delist” or “downlist” 30 species a year, creating a kind of quota system that encourages USFWS to look for species it can remove protections from — instead of looking to science to determine the protections a species needs. SELC is actively working to dismantle such anti-conservation policies. The law doesn’t allow federal agencies to walk away from species conservation, and SELC is committed to defending the South’s wildlife.